Especially when I'm two paragraphs deep in a reply and I have to start all over because I won something on facebook. Furious is the choice word that comes to mind.
These video ads should have never been approved. Greed, advertising dollars-based decision—plain and simple.
EDIT: AND ANYONE NOTICE IF YOU TAP EXACTLY ON THE X MOST OF THE TIME IT DOESN'T CLOSE?
You have to tap to the bottom-left of the X's corner.
We could do Groupon, cause so would I.
04m47s by plane, corner to corner.
You're welcome.
AGREED. Screw Kotaku.
Yi-Long
A great game is a great game. Tried and true designs are no reason to give something a lower rating.
If your Mom makes a great peach cobbler—let's say an 9/10—and then fifteen years later you try your girlfriend's mom's peach cobbler, and it's made basically the same way, and tastes the same your not going to rate it lower. EDIT: Unless you want to find a new girlfriend.
Now I'm.craving 🍑 cobbler.
This reviewer seems to have reviewed this game with the expectation that it was made in response to the previous two years' socio-political events.
So, these bad reviews are seemingly partly due to the reviewer's ignorance of the game's development history. It's not close enough aligned with the 'real world.'
And of course those on the other side who don't like how close it resembles American society.
There is certainly the possibility of an 'eighteen launch—especially if the PlayStation 5 comes in the last quarter of 'nineteen.
Sony has exceeded practically everyone's expectations up to this point, so who knows?
"Trolls?" Come on, man—some may have suggested it could get pushed back to become a launch title for PlayStation 5. Though, my personal belief is that it will launch on both the PS4 and PlayStation 5. In any case, I think dragging for "major trolls" is a bit of a stretch.
Yeah! Last of Us: Part II!
Glimmers and hints are slowly blooming into a tangible, devourable product.
So, it's official. This game is worth very few gamer's time and best avoided at this point.
Odd to see the fresh results of a specific-yet-anonymous, haphazard, resentful-to-life-in-general N4G user who downvotes perfectly acceptable, innocuous comments. The slight scent of sadness and regret still lingers.
This seems awesome. Nice idea for a feature and a great way to deepen the experience of Far Cry 5 even further.
Click-bait by an amateur writer. "A far cry from pleasing the fans?" Obviously has a loose-at-best understanding of what the word far-cry means.
Anyways, lots of 90s in the Metacritic Critics Reviews' list.
Damnit, who let EA sneak a successful game through the nets? Stop feeding the rat.
Yeah, either this censorship, or Microsoft won't last.
Yikes. This is kind of a big deal.
EDIT: Did the Pope become CEO of Microsoft (Mycusstop)?
There have been a few reviews that have done that now. Given it numerous praises but then turn bipolar when they have to decide on the score. It's kind of odd.
I'm liable to agree. Read through this article and decided despite the fact it's titled as a damning criticism the body of the story comes across as complimentary. Actually, I've read a few N4G poster's replies that state the same idea from other low-scored reviews. Seems as though there's some bipolarity issues going on with some of these reviewers.
Okay, just played the first five minutes—plain damn creepy how close America is to something like that actually happening. Especially after reading that story all over the news about the churches that the congregations brought AR-15s to service. Not to mention the utterly bold responses from so many AR-15 owners that they will start a civil war before giving up their military-style rifles.
I used to doubt this kind of thing, until I watched the video of around three dozen a...