Maybe if you're in the US, if you're a part of the rest of the world... while not wanting to burst your bubble, it doesn't quite work like that.
That's probably the most ignorant post I've read for a long time, regardless of consoles.
So a console (we're talking Arcade) at half the price, sold 3 times its competitor in its home country.
Cool.
Must be an amazing breakthrough for fanboys. Some people will hold on to anything.
Don't be a noddy.
People who post like this when it doesn't concern them are usually a little intimidated. GG.
If you truly believed MS's hype then you wouldn't even bother.
I'm stoked!
Awesome game, hoping this one is at least as good if not better.
Uncharted was a surprise for me in 2007, didn't think I'd dig it after the demo. Turned out to be my favorite SP game of that year, looking hell forward to Uncharted 2.
As for fanboys, sod off. If we could let you have it too most of us would. It's not good because it's exclusive, it's just good.
I hope you're kidding.
That's nowhere near the proper framerates, they've probably slowed it down to show visual differences better.
Are the 360's shadows on FC2 really cross hatched like that?
Thanks and done CBaoth
Have done the same for the same reasons, also added user to ignore.
"Idiot" is probably as good of a description as any.
Agreed.
People putting major spoilers for games not yet released in some regions need to sort it.
That's at you Solidsnakus, thanks a ton.
AC had so much potential, environments were good, story was mint, moves and combat were pretty cool. My biggest gripe was the whole game revolved around like 3 or 4 'mini' missions which was pretty unforgivable.
They created a very cool world and character, but they need to put a lot more work into the actual game for AC2.
Yeah me too.
A guy at work had his 360 rrod and is out of warranty, he's bought himself an arcade now. So that's 2 for 1 on one sale at least.
It's already been said the dlc won't be the size of shivering isles, but rather knights of the nine. Nice try though.
As for companies tying up dlc on cross platform games, I think it stinks and generally won't buy the title due to it. I know of others who feel the same so I think in the long run it's a loss for the developer and loyalty. Doesn't matter if it's MS or Sony, I think it's a pretty rubbish direction for gamers as a whole.
It's not all it's cracked up to ...
Is that sold or shipped?
I'd love to know how many were replacement models.
I think all 3 versions look pretty poor in comparison to most games around now tbh.
While not a conspiracy theorist, in general if you believed everything you read you'd think that the PS3 was in the toilet and floundering. Trouble is, if you start looking a stats, EA's and Ubisofts profits, how the install base is very close (even with the PS3 coming in a year late), comparing games yourselves, then things are a bit different.
Goes to show, the more a platform is at...
I was quite surprised when Ubsoft and EA released their profits recently, the PS3 being on top of the non handhelds (and all for EA) for sales/profit. Looking at the above charts I guess you can see why.
What gives with 360 sales as the install base last I read was still a little higher, piracy having an effect?
LBP is 7th Nov here.
You keep telling yourself that, you're a regular worry with your 360 vs ps3 stuff.