TheUndertaker85

Maybe they "forgot" a period between the two eights

It's actually directly from the article. Talking about Wii owners at this point would be absolutely pointless, particularly when talking about WiiU BC. Which again, Nintendo stated themselves to Famitsu it isn't happening.

Which should be a given at this point. The WiiU processed everything through the base console and didn't have anything as far as processing in the tablet. The Switch will literally be what the name says. Instead of the base doing the work the ...

#10 was already answered by Nintendo
#4 shows inaccurate numbers by far. "But… the possibility of backward compatibility with digital Wii U games is significant for the 88 million Wii U owners." while WiiU has only moved a fraction of that.

Plus why do we have to go over three pages for ten questions that frankly don't even offer decent answers?

My CoolPad Android phone can run UE4 too. Doesn't make it any better.

There's already a problem with this theory:

How much do you believe a 900p tablet costs? Now strap on the two controllers. Further add a base.

For a point of reference the WiiU GamePad costs $150 to replace. The WiiU GamePad doesn't even house processing units or really much of anything. The base was doing the work before.

Now the Switch will basically be a tablet housing its own components. The dock will have to house more than...

The Switch probably doesn't include touch features which DS, 3DS, and WiiU all use

What that "rambling" was about involved nothing to do with sales. Plus you actually bring up the competition.

"Sales only matter to me when when it force's competitors to try harder to earn my money."

I'd also note that you actually state you care about sales only when it's convenient.

Golf claps for the great individuals who can't even stick to an argument or statement. Golf claps all around I say! ...

If it's capped at 900p in both modes that seems to make the dock a little redundant

If there's no disc drive that pretty well eliminates backwards compatibility short of digital

Uh, who cares? It's a time limit of all things. Plus from the sound of the DLC it's something Dead Rising hasn't done before.

If you appreciate Dead Rising 4 you'll get the DLC. If not you likely won't. All I see happening is the base game giving you more time to explore or make decisions about how you're going to tackle the next portion.

The DLC being timed would actually make more sense as if you take too long you're a zombie...

You mean the same product that came out later and boasted anti-cheat, anti-mod technologies specifically for PC?

Rockstar doesn't have to sell six million copies when they already sell vastly more on consoles. Also, you mean five million as has been stated above.

Further Rockstar managed to move over 15 million on PS3 and 360 within a week. That's two consoles that were about to be replaced by PS4 & Xbox One. Those versions did not come out until later. Then those two consoles both went on to move more units than PC.

So are many mods if you get down to the nitty gritty. Ya know. Those mods that rip off developer coding.

So Nintendo doesn't have to try at all in your book but competitors being able to boast an already existing and growing library, much better online interactions they've spent more time working on, both having decent size install bases allowing more competition online along with more friends already on the platforms, and boasting increases to their already existing machines has to go out of their way?

Fine logic indeed. Nintendo hasn't released any specifics for ...

That's like asking why the two last gen consoles, PS3 & 360 made $1 Billion in three days, moving over 15 million copies in the first week.

That's 10 million more in a fraction of the time.

Consoles made them over a billion dollars in three days.

http://www.guinnessworldrec...

Consoles also moved over 15 million copies in the first week. That's two platforms with PS3 & 360 as the PS4 & Xbox One versions came out later.

3519d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment