Where's the exclusive games for Pro?
Oh that's right. Sony said there won't be any exclusives for Pro. They further have shown that the only way Pro will see increases over the base PS4 is if developers patch their product or remaster. Then things like frame rate won't be increased over base PS4 offerings due to it "being unfair".
People are here harking up 1080/60 or 4K/30 when the discussion could easily be 1080/>60. Most of...
As simple as Googling 'SCUF Elite Controller'.
https://scufgaming.com/scuf...
So again no, this isn't an old story. People need to learn to read past headlines.
Great. They're releasing more soon.
"The company will begin releasing accessories for the pro-gaming controller before the end of 2016 with the first being a range of different colored replaceable grips, thumbsticks, and paddle control systems."
"The company will begin releasing accessories for the pro-gaming controller before the end of 2016 with the first being a range of different colored replaceable grips, thumbsticks, and paddle control systems."
Clearly the part of the story that wouldn't be in a 2015 story. Read past the headline people.
Because backwards compatibility isn't on their system of choice.
Just like in a RDR 2 post I got disagreed with for stating Red Dead Redemption is already backwards compatible to a comment stating RDR isn't coming backwards compatible.
"The tournament-grade controller was unveiled last month by Sony; it will soon be joined by the Nacon Revolution as the only officially licensed third-party pro PS4 controllers on the market."
Only two Sony endorsed third party controllers and Sony outed it. Rather directly made by Sony or not they're branding and promoting it.
@shinrock: Why? This part of the sale is for Gold members only to give bigger sales to them. Even if those two games aren't for sale right now doesn't mean they won't be on the 25th.
Until then there's still a rather large list of games on sale now.
EA thinks anything will just rake in cash for them. This shouldn't be any more apparent after launching Titanfall 2 so close to Infinite Warfare and Battlefield 1.
They thought they'd kill Infinite Warfare by packing two of their own titles in the same timeframe. Neither has managed to move as much as CoD has.
Then Nintendo owners would once again deliver the message they aren't willing to buy games available to them. Resulting in third parties backing away from the product based on low sales.
So in other words we can live the Wii U life once again.
It'd be larger commercial suicide to hype a game coming to a console for so long with numerous delays just to cancel it.
They've already put out the promise of the game coming to Wii U. Current Wii U owners have already been told it'll come to them and many made their purchase with Zelda in mind.
Talking about what you're going to deliver then failing to deliver it doesn't breed trust with consumers. It diminishes it. It'd be even ...
@indysurfn:
-150MHz clock increase to an already underclocked product doesn't align with a 4GB to 8GB ram increase
-False information. Unless you're speaking about dev kits increasing available ram which went from 4GB to 4.5GB. Even then dev kits were said to have anywhere from 8GB to 16GB.
http://www.techradar.com/...
@Fishy Fingers: Somewhat but not entirely.
Any Xbox 360 games you receive via Games with Gold are yours to keep even if your subscription to Live lapses or you don't subscribe again.
PS4, PS3, and PS Vita PlayStation Plus subscribers lose all access with no Plus subscription. You'd have to buy into Plus again to regain access.
So in that aspect 360 games via Games with Gold are free or definitely more in the category of free com...
@mkis007: Yet people are now harking about games over graphics no?
Xbox One currently plays the original title at no extra cost. That includes the DLC content. Why would individuals on one console who can already play the game pay for a remaster that won't offer much more?
In other words Xbox One already plays the game. If a remaster happens Xbox One will have both options while competitors will only have one option that inevitably costs them more.
Uh... How?
"So much for RDR BC."
To which Xbox One offers Red Dead Redemption backwards compatibility. PS4 doesn't offer backwards compatibility thus they don't and likely never will.
You don't have to pay for Live to keep the 360 titles you receive
@Neonridr: Specs likely wouldn't change this close to launch, particularly when nvidia has basically confirmed the processor type and launch of the console is supposed to be in four months. Games like Zelda are already being created with a system in mind as well.
No but the Wii U version has been pushed back to 2017 as well with no release window... Maybe they're launching both on the same day.
http://www.nintendo.com/gam...
Because if a remaster is true at all Xbox One owners will be able to continue using their original copies for no extra cost. All PS4 owners would have to purchase the remaster.
In other words one console already plays the game at no extra cost.
That's the plan. The Switch version has been stated to release after the Wii U version.
Wouldn't be a shocker either seeing as the Wii U version was already being created when they decided to port to Switch.
@MasterCornholio: Such as LittleBigPlanet 3 which came out on PS4 and PS3 yet didn't feature crossplay? Even though both versions were on a PlayStation platform?
How about The Last of Us? Uncharted 2 & 3 where the remasters actually lost online play? Journey?