@Fallen
And I'm letting you know that the number you are seeing for any of the third party titles on Switch may be different than what's listed on VGChartz because of digital sales. That's all.
For example, a game like Mario + Rabbids may have only sold just over 2 million. But a game like Rocket League (predominantly purchased digitally) may be at 3 or 4 million. The success of third party games isn't limited to what Mario + Rabbids has ...
The idea is kinda cool. But the combat looks awful, and the overall presentation isn't great. This is a fan project though, so props to them.
I pretty clearly explained why I'm bringing digital sales into this. Gamecube lacked digital sales, the Switch does not. The number you see on VGChartz are limited in that capacity for the Switch.
You are forgetting that the Gamecube was limited to only physical media, meanwhile the Switch also has a digital marketplace that cannot be accounted for by VGChartz. It's estimated that digital to physical purchase ratio is about a 35/65 split on Switch.
Dude, it's one of the fastest selling Switch games, and the game is fun to play. As good as a core title? No, but it's not crap and people seem to enjoy it/want it.
@Pody
Horizon Zero Dawn does have enemy levels. Or did I misunderstand your comment?
@2pacalyps
Lol you still don't know what he said. You just know the context now.
@2pacalypsenow
Well, don't expect to get the full story if you don't read the article. It's not about Reggie hoping to release the N64 Classic. It's about him commenting on others hope for it.
You should read the article, not just the title.
@PhoenixUp
That depends on what type of console they are aiming for. The PSP aimed for PS2 quality visuals and mostly succeeded. The GBA aimed for SNES quality visuals and mostly succeeded (and in some ways exceeded).
The Vita aimed for PS3 quality visuals and didn't succeed in providing what was promised. It's capabilities fit rather snugly right between PS2 and PS3
Nothing is wrong with companies using others ideas. That's how gaming moves forward. Something I like on the PS4 is share-play and the share button in particular, both of which Nintendo has on the Switch (though share-play is only on their NES titles).
@PhoenixUp
I've never said it was okay. I never said that the Switch offered the exact same experiences as PS4 and Xbox One on the go. I've stated this repeatedly throughout my discussion with FallenAngel, and I'm getting the impression none of you guys are actually reading what I'm telling you.
At this point in time we know what engines support the Vita and which ones don't. Your argument is an unverified assumption. That isn't a good argument.
I NEVER said that Gravity Rush could have been done on the PS2. Why continue trying to bring that up? Stop.
Yes, Fortnite decreases rendering resolution, polygonal models, texture resolution, framerate, graphical effects, and rendering distance on mobile. Full Frontal Assault decreases rendering...
There are many other examples of games that look significantly worse on Vita. XCom, Mortal Kombat, Borderlands 2, even remasters like God of War. I'm not just pulling from one example. I've provided many in my previous replies.
"The difference being that while Vita can PS3 games that are scaled to its limitations"
Unverified assumption. I've already pointed out the many engines that don't run on Vita. There is no guarantee that something like Frostbite 2 for Battlefield 3 or CryEngine for Crysis 3.
"The cross platform Vita games weren’t so scaled down from their PS3 counterparts as Fortnite clearly is."
Full Frontal Assault's framerate is...
@FallenAngel
YOU were the one that said that it's ridiculous to say the Switch is comparable to the PS3 because, and I quote, "Except Switch can clearly play games that PS3 can’t, so it’s really absurd to say the two are comparable". IF you think THIS is true, and the PS3 can run games the PSV can't, then...?
"Fortnite on mobile is a very stripped down version of the game running on the absolutely lowest graphics settings in sure th...
@FallenAngel
Okay, I think you are grossly misinterpreting most of what I've said. YOU wanted my opinion on the Switch (rather, you assumed my position and I clarified). I DON'T believe that the Switch is as comparable to the X1/PS4 as others might, but I would say it's more comparable than the Vita was to the PS3, but less than the PSP to the PS2. Also, to use your own response, the PS3 can run games that the Vita cannot, so it's really absurd to say they a...
@FallenAngel
Okay, well if you want my opinion on the Switch I'd say it's more comparable than the Vita is to the PS3, but much less than the PSP was to the PS2. The PSP was incredibly close to the PS2 visually, and was really impressive at the time.
Anyway, the Vita offering some experiences similar to it's console brethren is great, but that doesn't mean that it was overall comparable. The Vita was a pretty powerful portable device for i...
@FallenAngel
I'm not sure why you are bringing up the Switch. I'd consider the PSP to be comparable with the PS2, but the Vita isn't comparable with the PS3.
I think Pokemon Let's Go is the perfect spin off to implement what many people have wanted for a while, a cross region Pokemon game.
Personally, I think the only reason that hasn't been done is due to the leveling. By the time you'd reach the third region your Pokemon would be so incredibly overpowered. Catching lower level Pokemon would be almost useless. But some of the Let's Go mechanics remedy that.
However, I still want a core Pokem...