Lol no one cares what these no name sites put as their review. They have no credibility.
I can already tell you that Rookie was probably refreshing the search results page every 5 seconds till he got something that was over a 9. Took him long enough lol
More like people here that are Xbox fanboys (above and in just about every quantum break review article) forget how to do math when reviews aren't what they want them to be.
Some people honestly think that two troll reviews are why it has a 78 lol
He'll change his tune come E3, lose bubbles and then come back to this again. Same old same old. No one takes him seriously.
Lets try this again...the two troll 4/10 scores on metacritic...that everyone says brought the score down...actually evens out with the two 10/10 fanboy scores. Thy average together to two 7/10 scores.
Also, there are about 20+ scores, out of the 75, around 90. With about 36+ scores from 60-84. Not polarizing at all. It's called a bell curve to those that don't know. And the average for the game falls right at 78. This is how every game is scored. This game is simply...
I'm waiting to hear how polarizing the review scores are. Especially considering that the two 4/10 scores on metacritic...that everyone says brought the score down...actually evens out with the two 10/10 fanboy scores. Thy average together to two 7/10 scores.
Also, there are about 20 scores, out of the 75, around 90. With about 36+ scores from 60-84. Not polarizing at all. It's called a bell curve to those that don't know. And the average for the game falls right...
@KiwiViper
Take 75 reviews with two outlier reviews at 4/10 and two at 10/10. They average out to 7/10 which in Quantum Breaks exact case puts that right alongside the 32+ honest reviews that put it from 60-84. No excuse for quantum break this time unfortunately thanks to maths.
That's how it works. And usually, for any game, two small "troll" reviews usually even out the fanboy reviews. It's called a bell curve.
---------...
1 review at a 4/10 would not bring it down by that much if the majority on metacritic are in the 90s. Doesn't work like that.
@neoandrew
How is 50 or 5/10 average?? 50 or 5/10 is definitely below average.
@Septic
They've been out in the wild for reviewers and others already -_- the ending is already up just about everywhere you can find a 5hr walk through.
No need to get defensive by making it seem like I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm not surprised though honestly lol
Lmao, good try guilty. Pulling numbers out of your you know what doesn't change the fact that it's still BS.
The game has spoken for itself and reviews across the board average out at it being average at best. Nothing close to what it was hyped up to be unfortunately. And I don't think the sub-HD resolution/textures at 30fps w/dips helps.
The reviews are hardly polarizing. As an example, there's two outliers on both ends of the spectrum for metacritic. While the majority fall between roughly between 75-86. Not bad scores at all mind you, just average.
And the game has been out "in the wild" for a long while already. Even this site just stated that they've been playing it for a while (read their comment above in this comment section). It's spoken for itself and they've stated that it&...
You'd more than likely be one of the ones complaining about it being in the selection of free games if it ever were released for PS+.
That's it? Honest question.
Sounds like an empty year for MS again. Releasing one high budget game in the spring and blowing their load between a few weeks in the fall. It's hilarious that people defend this practice. Waiting all year for a couple of reused franchises and a one/two new ones to come out all at once.
Some, or most, of the ones you mentioned don't even have a release date. Honestly, how are people not smart enough consumers to understand this?
This concept can be used toward A LOT of things. It's a solid question, but concern trolls will be all over this.
Lol where were you when Xbox so graciously gave Pool Nation for 3-4 months in a row?
I forgot about the 'open' beta since I played it for like an hour compared to the full beta early on. That's why your comment didn't click at all to me. My bad.
Luckily the best PS4 gaming features aren't behind a paywall, but you're missing out on it though man. As a Weeknd fan, especially after seeing this picture, I know that you'd get the best out of it like he probably does on his preferred console.
3734d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment
I'm reading and re-reading your comment...and I just don't get how you love the multiplayer if you didn't even have plus to try it out?
I'll just wait for your eventual comment that goes something like: "blah blah blah....YouTube....blah blah blah...friends house....blah blah blah...I had it only for the month during the beta....". Feel free to fill in the blanks for us here on N4G.
Rookie, you realize that a company can do both core games and bring new and exciting gaming hardware experiences right?
You and a lot of others have been used to having to settle for a lot of stuff this gen that causes you to have that mindset. Especially when MS's "core games" are the same franchises recycled over a 2-3 year period.
@poppinslops @Rookie
So I guess we're going to ignore the fact that it's a no name site? Oh wait that's right, that card is only used when the review isn't what the fanboys want (:
@SolidGear
No no I agree that story originality is there. Not denying that. The game overall, gameplay included, is just not what it was hyped up to be over the past two years. Some just can't live with the fact that it's a solid 8.0/10.0 to...