The one that is guaranteed to have innovative hardware, diverse games (not just dude-bro exclusives), VR compatibility, and communication across the most devices compared to the competition.
Yeah, I'd say that the "PS4K" is a no brainier for someone who knows how to spend their money wisely.
3639d ago 10 agree22 disagreeView commentInappropriate
"Why does it feels like this Single player mode is going to feel & come off as a desperate attempt to fix what should have been there to begin with."
Considering that a lot of companies/devs are doing this nowadays (specifically online only games and one particular console that lacks features which should have been there from the start), it really wouldn't be surprising if it did come off as that. I love the game, but I already have my expectations low unf...
"Hope you understand the meaning of 'feature' is NOT the same as 'policy' and 'generation' and 'history' are NOT the same. Class dismiss. LOL"
Why would you call the Play Anywhere FEATURE (as stated in the previous article) a policy? There is a huge difference between the two that I don't think you understand. Not surprised really after your immature opening to your comment. But clearly it's a concept you've yet to grasp...
3641d ago 2 agree6 disagreeView commentInappropriate
Does anyone know if any of the Splinter Cell games are Backwards compatible? I can't find blacklist like a lot of forums say is available. But specifically, I'm trying to find out if SC: Pandora Tomorrow is.
I guess you don't remember all the limitations in basic features like (HDMI, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth compatibility across headsets and controllers, wireless rechargeable controllers, six-axis controller, most precise motion devices on the market [even if it didn't take off at the time], etc.).
Think a little harder next time(: there's definitely no copying going on there. If anything it's the other way around in hardware.
Sony bled billions? I guess we're going to forget about the RROD? Oh yeah, MS were such hardware innovators when it came to that. No other console in history had such a failure rate. That they did and do lead in.
You keep bringing up how cheaper the Xbox 360 was. Yet you clearly don't remember that the controllers were wired or required batteries (rechargeable batteries were $30), there was no HDMI input (except that failure $150 HD DVD breakout box) and you had to pay...
Sony have always been the lead in hardware when it comes to innovation. Stuff they had on the PS3 back 10years ago was way ahead of what the competition could even offer. Bluray as an example is the standard now, none of that ridiculous disc swapping that people defended in 2010 (3 disc final fantasy 13). And to top it off, some consoles still don't even utilize Bluetooth, and we're in 2016 where even the smallest headphones have it now.
Judging by the first few sets of comments, it's good to hear that sales matter again!...at least until the numbers don't come out in their favor lol
3646d ago 6 agree21 disagreeView commentInappropriate
Well when you think about it, there's not much else they can do. Then again, MS is the lowest on the totem pole when it comes to having the most and quality exclusives.
Price point is definitely the name of the game..along with having diverse and abundant games at the respective launch.
MS has time with about 2 years to go. But luckily Sony has been consistent with their message of great launch game experiences. I also expect NMS to be included in some form or fashion.
It seems like it's still the larger of all the consoles. Even with a power brick FINALLY integrated inside of it.
They've had numerous up boxing and size comparison videos in person. Which show the actual size. But it's blatantly False Advertisement when looking at the "megaton" video they showed at E3. Not surprised honestly. Evdn the cancelled Fable game is still used as promotional content in their Best Buy stations.
December? They're sending this game to the chopping block by doing that. Too many established franchises coming around that time period.
I don't understand why MS continually does this. One game in the spring and the rest from October-December. They do realize that a year is 12 months, not 3 right?
Except it was definitely the more capable console of last gen. Games like MGS4 and TLOU are factual evidence of that. Considering that the PS3 had the most exclusives last gen, sub-par third party games (because of cell) was the least of anyone's worry.
I think the more important thing is the Game Difference. You can have the most powerful console, but if all you have is a handful of recycled franchises it's useless. Luckily Sony has both this gen and had the same last gen with the PS3.
Didn't know MS used a touch pad or share button? Heck MS' controller will barely be getting Bluetooth this fall and its 2016...how ridiculous is that. Sounds like the copying is going the other way that you're saying it is. (:
In the real world the weaker console is usually the one that is cheaper. Just because people paid $500 this gen for a machine with no hardware innovation, doesn't mean that Sony will do the same for Neo if the specs are what they say.
"Why does it feels like this Single player mode is going to feel & come off as a desperate attempt to fix what should have been there to begin with."
Considering that a lot of companies/devs are doing this nowadays (specifically online only games and one particular console that lacks features which should have been there from the start), it really wouldn't be surprising if it did come off as that. I love the game, but I already have my expectations low unf...
Does anyone know if any of the Splinter Cell games are Backwards compatible? I can't find blacklist like a lot of forums say is available. But specifically, I'm trying to find out if SC: Pandora Tomorrow is.
If I read correctly it's only for Xbox exclusives (actually now called Windows 10 exclusives). And that third party would come down the line.
Just some friendly info so that you don't buy digital games that aren't compatible with the feature just yet.
I guess you don't remember all the limitations in basic features like (HDMI, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth compatibility across headsets and controllers, wireless rechargeable controllers, six-axis controller, most precise motion devices on the market [even if it didn't take off at the time], etc.).
Think a little harder next time(: there's definitely no copying going on there. If anything it's the other way around in hardware.
Sony bled billions? I guess we're going to forget about the RROD? Oh yeah, MS were such hardware innovators when it came to that. No other console in history had such a failure rate. That they did and do lead in.
You keep bringing up how cheaper the Xbox 360 was. Yet you clearly don't remember that the controllers were wired or required batteries (rechargeable batteries were $30), there was no HDMI input (except that failure $150 HD DVD breakout box) and you had to pay...
Sony have always been the lead in hardware when it comes to innovation. Stuff they had on the PS3 back 10years ago was way ahead of what the competition could even offer. Bluray as an example is the standard now, none of that ridiculous disc swapping that people defended in 2010 (3 disc final fantasy 13). And to top it off, some consoles still don't even utilize Bluetooth, and we're in 2016 where even the smallest headphones have it now.
There's no doubt in my ...
Well when you think about it, there's not much else they can do. Then again, MS is the lowest on the totem pole when it comes to having the most and quality exclusives.
Price point is definitely the name of the game..along with having diverse and abundant games at the respective launch.
MS has time with about 2 years to go. But luckily Sony has been consistent with their message of great launch game experiences. I also expect NMS to be included in some form or fashion.
That's exactly how false advertisement works.
It seems like it's still the larger of all the consoles. Even with a power brick FINALLY integrated inside of it.
They've had numerous up boxing and size comparison videos in person. Which show the actual size. But it's blatantly False Advertisement when looking at the "megaton" video they showed at E3. Not surprised honestly. Evdn the cancelled Fable game is still used as promotional content in their Best Buy stations.
December? They're sending this game to the chopping block by doing that. Too many established franchises coming around that time period.
I don't understand why MS continually does this. One game in the spring and the rest from October-December. They do realize that a year is 12 months, not 3 right?
No arguing there.
Except it was definitely the more capable console of last gen. Games like MGS4 and TLOU are factual evidence of that. Considering that the PS3 had the most exclusives last gen, sub-par third party games (because of cell) was the least of anyone's worry.
Sony is truly unmatched, and in a league of its own, in terms of quality game diversity.
Top notch trailer overall!
I think the more important thing is the Game Difference. You can have the most powerful console, but if all you have is a handful of recycled franchises it's useless. Luckily Sony has both this gen and had the same last gen with the PS3.
By refining hardware they already had?
Didn't know MS used a touch pad or share button? Heck MS' controller will barely be getting Bluetooth this fall and its 2016...how ridiculous is that. Sounds like the copying is going the other way that you're saying it is. (:
In the real world the weaker console is usually the one that is cheaper. Just because people paid $500 this gen for a machine with no hardware innovation, doesn't mean that Sony will do the same for Neo if the specs are what they say.