Cuz this is 'Merika, fuck yeah!!!
Jackie Chan!!!
Textures and visuals are always being improved upon. But gameplay is immortal.
Bungie's games are not about graphics.
How can you even compare the visuals of an open world game to a linear adventure shooter?
GTA IV had some amazing visuals and physics. People here claim to dislike it because it was too realistic.
The Rockstar Advanced Game Engine cost about 100 million dollars to develop. So, I do find it impressive that THQ will match GTA IV's visuals, even though GTAIV was released about 2 years ago.
That was so satisfying. But next time, they should throw something heavier, and sharper.
Que? I've had 5 bubbles for a few months now.
Maybe everyone else got better at making games. Or maybe a lot of the unpopular fan favorites that people on this site are begging to see sequels of weren't as good as they remember.
It's easy to blame Capcom for trying to westernize, but I think that despite a few poor decisions with western game development, Capcom is making the right choice by expanding into the western market with more tenacity.
Resident Evil 5 and Lost Planet 2 were both heavily...
"But also, when fairly compared to other games, it is not as good as it is made out to be."
Once again, fact v. opinion.
I disagree with what you're saying. As far as the whole package goes, Halo 3 provides something that most other competing shooters do not. A solid MP with a map editor, 4 player online co-op campaign, theater mode, file sharing, and a fully tracked record on Bungie.net.
I really don't know what's you...
shut up omega.
Yes GWAVE, I see what you did there. You did what you always do. You justify your moronic tendencies by pointing to a monkey and saying, "But he did it, too!"
I see you trollin'. I'm hatin'.
Necrum, developers don't support games will DLC. They support themselves by cutting content from their games and then releasing them later so they can squeeze a few more bucks out of gamers.
Trophies aren't that important. MGS4 didn't have 'em, either.
Fuck DLC, unless it's absolutely free. If a developer says they just thought of something and would like to add it to the game to make it better, they shouldn't charge players for t...
So half life 2 is not a 2004 game?
It's received a significant upgrade in coding since the Orange Box was released. You can see a lot of improvements in textures and facial animations in L4D, as well as depth of field and lighting. But the most improvements can be seen in Portal 2.
You can't apply your personal opinion of Halo 3 to everyone.
I stand by facts, you stand buy opinions.
The numbers prove that Halo 3 is still a popular game today.
Your opinion is that it is bland. A large number of people disagree.
That's the basic reason for the existence of consoles, isn't it?
It restricts the variability of the system to allow developers greater focus on a single architecture and allows the console maker to have greater control over content.
It would most certainly be cheaper for Sony and MS to have their developers develop for PC and distribute over STEAM. I wonder why they don't.
It's a 2004 game dude.
How do you know he's miserable?