Absolutely.
And here we were all told repeatedly that this was going to be the "Year of the PS3".
Oh well.
Too bad Halo 4 > all of Sony announcements
Not unless it's on XBL, sorry.
Because you have better numbers?
@ UnwanteDreamz
Dude, you don't even HAVE an argument, let alone know how to spell it. Sure you can take home a Move controller for $50, but what good does that do you? No game to play it with, and no camera to use it with. $150 dollars might be more for Kinect, but it gets you EVERYTHING YOU NEED. For two players to have Move controllers and a game and camera, IT'S MORE MONEY.
A bargain means getting more for your money, not how little you need to sp...
It's really just the bonus Move content for LBP that they've been teasing us for some time.
@UnwanteDreamz
The subject here is the question of whether Move is a better bargain. Here's the math since you seem to not be able to add yourself:
By the time you buy two full Move controllers @ $80, a camera for $30, and a game on top of that, you are WELL over the asking price of $150 for Kinect (which supports two players). Even if you forgoe the Navigator, with a cam and two controllers and game, you are still over the price of the MS controller. <...
@ Ju
It's not a lie, dumbass. If you don't buy the Navigator, you can't play all of the games that Move supports. That brings the price of each controller to $80.
Please remove the Move controller from your rectum before replying, okay?
@ Ju
Apparently you can't do math then. Even if you get the Move bundle @ $99, you're still out at least $70 to get the second controller. Kinect costs $150 and supports two players AND includes a game (and a much better one that the Move Sports game to boot) .
Sounds like a bargain to me.
On N4G if you agree with anything even remotely positive about the Xbox, you get a flood of disagrees. It means you are probably telling the truth. :)
Don't take it personally, it's just a couple of people with multiple accounts.
Do yourself a favor and change that stinky tampon of yours
So, is this yet another in a long line of "PS3 Exclusives!" that fails to change the face of gaming as we know it?
Couldn't agree more. It's like someone telling you that their Honda can get to 60mph faster than your BMW. Even if that were true, they're still driving a Japanese piece of shit. I don't mind paying for quality.
I prefer Live to PSN any day of the week. Before writing me off as a fanboy, consider:
I can jump in and out of games quickly, follow my friends or people I've just met to play any game that we want - regardless if it's in the drive or not. The voice chat is significantly clearer on Live (because PSN does not support VoIP), matchmaking is faster, the games have less lag overall. The EXPERIENCE itself and the ability to meet and make friends with new people is much eas...
GWAVE must not be very well endowed in real life if he has to keep bolstering his e-peen by attacking putting down the Xbox and Kinetic.
Sure we demand more. And you're branded a troll because you constantly put down products you've never even tried (or anything on a Microsoft platform) because of a blind fanaticism to Sony.
You'd think GWAVE would have something better to do than troll Kinetic articles all day long or create alt accounts like __crissy to give himself agrees. You must be really threatened by Microsoft.
Get your bubbles up before you cry "fail"
Yes! I've been waiting for this game to hit consoles.
Except that none of the first Wii U games can actually run at 1080p apparently - Darksiders 2 and AC3 are both confirmed to only be running at 720p. There's not enough power to run the game at that high a resolution and still run the tablet.