@Gribble
Try it out for yourself before you condone actual footage of the service. This is releasing this summer, not sure how much better you expect it to be.
800p? 30fps? Even the X1 could do better than that...
Does anyone actually care about the games anymore, or are they caught up in resolution comparisons... how the textures in version "X" look 0.02% blurrier...whose launch had faker applause...
The well-being of Sony, Nintendo or Microsoft has nothing to do with your genitals.
This from the guy who confuses pixel density with vertical resolution?
"You can't become a mod if you are a fanboy, it defeats the purpose of this site. "
That's where you're wrong I'm afraid. If that were the case, this site wouldn't have the reputation that it does. Attack me as much as you want, but there's a reason why people say things like that - it's the truth.
"N4G is just a typical gaming website on the internet. It isn't a Sony fansite, it isn't run by Sony fanboys, it's just a gaming news aggregate with loud gamers."
Unfortunately, that's just not true anymore. I've been reading this site for years as well and seen some of the worst Sony fanboys getting promoted to staff.
The result? They use their power to kill stories they don't like and promote the ones they do, and that in ...
I remember OnLive being 60fps, while Gaikai was 30
Here's another tip for you: don't put words in other people's mouths. I never said that I don't like the Vita and I definitely never commented on the screen quality. You're the one who's reporting this story as "fake" simply because the author said that the new screen was slightly blurrier and less saturated - without ever having seen it yourself.
Sony doesn't pay you drones to defend them at every turn, so why bother? Seeing as you'r...
So the article is fake according to you, just because they noted that it's slightly less saturated and sharp?
It's amusing that you disagree with them. Clearly you've seen the unit in person and done your own comparison - oh wait, you haven't. Welp, there goes your credibility.
Here's a tip: stop equating your favorite video game hardware with your self worth.
that's almost as ignorant you you calling it a "pi chart"
So it's now the media's fault that my Vita has been sitting unused for almost a year? Well thanks Gribblegrunger, I was laboring under the misconception that the Vita had no games to play because there was nothing on it that interested me.
Thank heavens there are people like you telling us these things!
Apparently he has changed to a different brand of tampons?
Farcry is an FPS gramps, perhaps it's time for you to retire if at your age you can no longer distinguish genres.
The Sony Defense Force© has been claiming that "this is the year" that the PS3 will overtake the Xbox for years now. But the race is over and Sony will have lost in the eyes of the public because the next generation is starting, and MS is just a few months away from launching their newest console.
It won't help that the Xbox division is very profitable for Microsoft, while Playstation is in the dumps financially.
You can try and blur the li...
@ Ihaa
"Super Mario Galaxy for one had many graphical techniques not done in any game."
That's not true; rim-lighting and reflective surfaces are not new in console games, just new to the Wii. It looked good only because it didn't rely on any realistic graphics lighting techniques which the Wii was bad at creating.
@ Imalwaysright
In terms of this article, the term generation has everything to do with tech...
Perhaps you should spend your time reading articles you agree with, gramps.
Well, you did say "most PS3 gamers don't know/care about PS Plus", and then used your friends as the primary example.
-
Maybe they're disagreeing because they feel sorry that a 50+ year old man has nothing better to do than troll this site and argue with children over video games.
How absolutely pathetic. You have my sympathies, gramps.
Good news. Perhaps now someone will do something with the game.