There is no port in games that are made by huge teams like R* and Ubi.There was 400 people working on ACB,it makes no sense to port it when you have 10+ ps3 coders on your team.
All this Black Ops(COD) hate is getting on my nerves.MW1 was exceptional game,offline and online.MW2 was not so hot,along with being not so hot Activision was greedy as hell so that hit the gamers nerves.But BO is amazing package.Great SP,quite long with great story and characters,fixed multiplayer with lots of features and co op play.What is wrong with COD now?Its great game that deserves AAA status,so shut the fuck up spoiled girls with those stupid articles.
Story,pacing and locations were put together extremely nicely.Games story is freaking brilliant for video game,especially fps.
MW2 on avg looks somewhat better but Black Ops has more levels that wowed me...Vorkuta,WMD,Laos,ending under water etc look better than anything in MW2.
Why the fuck did Jimmy Riddle get disagrees for saying totally right thing,honest and unbiased,common sense stuff and Leon Blu got agrees because he is blaming 360 for ps3 version being worse.And all that,not because of gpu,not because of cpu,not even because of memory.Its because stupid disk space.WHAT does disk space have to do with resolution please answer me!Stupid N4G,this site should really be renamed N4PS3 cus this is how it looks like...man you guys act like little butthurth girls... ...
On average game does not look better than MW2,but some levels like these three,that stand out,IMO look better than any from MW2.
Yes but than again COD are 60 fps.That means twice less time to render each frame than "regular" games.Only racers can be 60fps at 720p,games like COD noup.
Yea that level is great,very atmospheric.Did you get to that snow level where you are climbing down the mountain?That looks s.i.c.k and its fun to! :)
Black Ops>MW2.Valkutra level(prison),laos,and snow level are absolute marvel.Better looking than anything in MW2,believe me ;)
not animations,facial animations that is.And yea,they are spectacular,better than anything out there.
great,but Noirs are definitely better.
They were right about their facial animation tech.Its the best i have seen,definitely.
Best facial animations i have seen in video game...wow...looks great,cant wait!
Best facial animations i have seen in video game...wow...looks great,cant wait!
FPS are important to a game like COD even if you dont feel it.It makes your respond,from pressing the button to actually shooting in game twice less.The bad part is that you have twice less time to render the frame.From 33.3ms to 16ms,so you sacrifice much of graphics.I feel the difference but i am all for 30fps on consoles,just not for games like COD and Forza/GT.
Been playing 360 version and graphics are ANYTHING but mediocre.Sure,they are no KZ3 but than again KZ3 does not run at 60fps.First level of the game looks meh but as soon as you go to Vorkuta game really starts to looks nice.Particularly characters and lighting.Here...take a look at this shot for example...
http://images.eurogamer.net...
Why the disagrees?Did he say something wrong?
Kinect in all honesty is probably a fun thing...when want to have fun with friends and girlfriends at flat its really great.Its great for kids and women also,its not(as of now) a gamers dream but with E3 debacle it looks like its saving its face now,people seem to like it.
The same...both look a bit off though...
And when i said that there was NO port since companies like UBi and R* have dedicated programmers for games they gave me tens of disagrees...When blockbuster game is done by 400 people with budget of tens of milions dollars,its obvious there will be at least dedicate coder teams,and those are GOOD ones...
Now you guys look at LOT face off article and look at your comments two days ago..."ubi sucks""lazy devs" etc.