For killzone 2 i dont agree at all.They could even crank up particle effects on 360 and all that in their full res because of big eDRAM badwidth.
I also was a little confused since PCs have kb/mouse on Expo here and on Gamescom and this one obviously looks like it was played with controller.
Of course he is pissed because stupid Gamespot and IGN are the most popular sites and it will probably reflect on sales and later reviews.I mean...look at reviews for this game(especially from EDGE and Eurogamer),they are mostly ~9 and to give it so much lower score is total debacle.7,5 are scores that you give for fun games that lack real quality and polish and Caslevania CERTAINLY is not one of them.I cant understand that game with such polish,such graphics and amazing story and all around ...
Outside of more tearing and little frame rate difference i dont see a single difference in graphics.Totally the same.
Nope not really.I mean Reach is huge and it looks damn nice(something similar to what Insomniac does with RE on ps3) but it just doesent go for best when it comes to looks.Its technically great,with great per object motion blur,lots of a.i,huge sandbox level etc.but UC2,GOWIII,KZ2 and now Castlevania are all above.
Castlevania is pretty impressive technically also to be fair.Amazing lighting,camera motion blur and per object motion blur,stunning textures,vistas,artstyle......
See...this is what i was talking about yesterday.You just cant say something good for 360 even if its true,you are disagree bound...
This looks incredible,agreed.Definitely up there with the best,definitely best looking game on 360.
But nothing beats UC2 because UC2 has best production value and polish.
Good...game looked very unimaginative.I still remember their "cgi quality engine" that would enable them 60 fps at 1080p with cgi quality on 5 year old hardware and all that from people who never developed game before...year right!
Developers should just stop with japping and being arrogant...
And btw...man you guys are insecure and stupid.I mean...just look at your comments and than look at agrees you get,it pathetic.360 fanboys could NEVER say such things and get at least couple of agrees.Just shows how much you guys are insecure with your power thing.Just wait for Castlevania to show up,i bet it will be superior on 360 than you can continue with your silly crying and moaning.
This NFS will most probably be better than Motorstorm but GT5 is another thing...its game with much bigger production value,it is the best known racer and it is simulation.
PS3 has better price value than 360,thats a fact but 360 is incredibly fun system and people do see that.
YESSSSSSSSSS!!! So glad it scored well!
Officially its 24 hours :)
Whoa...it looks marvelous on ps3...
crazy sob...
GT5 has much more realistic lighting...
Video is fast forwarded...
looks meh...
All their games run on more than 10 year old engine.They update it regulary and it looks great...just look at PORTAL 2.And their games are ALWAYS optimized,and when their new engine is ready they look and run better than almost anything out on the market.
decent on ps3,on 360 its the best looking open world game by far...