Is it also in the manual that with the PS3 you will have to load the game on the hard drive because of the slow transfer rate of the Blue-Ray player, or did they forget to put that part in.
Blue-Ray was a good choice for PS3 --- oh
The problem is that Sony is too focused on Blue-Ray. Instead of getting a console out faster and which cost less. They are spending the majority of their budget on losses of the PS3 due to blue-Ray instead of great exclusive games; And maintaining the ones they had.
Microsoft knows it's all about the games, that's why they continue to get great exclusives, and take away one time sony exclusives. And focus on great Online gameplay.
At the same time Sony says they...
Gaming comes second to Blue-Ray. but it does have potential (the potential to play games)
Glad Microsoft made the right choice.
I thought BlueRay was good for games. Good thing sony thought of gaming first and blueRay second...oh
It also has the "potential" to play games.
It's the mean fat burning machine... you can cook hamburgers, steaks, chicken....
I notice peksi voting "cool" on every PS3 article. He must be a Fanboy.
Other Post he States:
"Yet another copy from Microshaft"
"Windows: OS/2 ripoff, Word: a WordPerfect ripoff, Internet Explorer: a Netscape ripoff, Xbox: a PS2 ripoff, Zune: an iPod ripoff, Xboy: a GameBoy ripoff. Where the hell is Microsoft's innovativity?? Sold away for $$$?? "
He is a true Fanboy. Like sony says he would buy the console ev...
Funny how must of the people are selling them on eBay. It's the only reason i would buy one.
"it plays games right?"
it only has the potential to play games....
it will play blueray movies and cures cancer... and has the potential to play games.
because of blueray you have to run off disk now.. but blueray is more important then gaming..
He is from a communist country. So he likes big government running his life.
Sony forgot to add the fact that the batteries in their controllers cannot be replaced. so every year or two you will have to spend $50.00 on a new controller. On the 360 i just spend a few dollards and buy new batteries. Plus their free online will cost more in the long run, since you will be nickled and dimes to death... paying for demos????
Paying for demos is the long run will cost much more then what microsoft charges for LIVE Gold. What i pay in a year you will be paying a month. plus the crappy online service... That's your free online service...you've been pawned!
how is it more value for my money to me, if i pay for things i do not need, such as HD movies, and wireless network. I think it is more value to save the $200.00. Glad microsoft gives me a choice. I repeat i have no interest in ever watching a movie, or even a HD movie on my console, and i am glad i was able to save the money. Since XBOX 1 i have never once watched a DVD movie on my console. That's what my 400 disk dvd changer is for.
Quote: " wish everyone would give it a rest about the price of the PS3. You get what you pay for. "
So this means the sony online service will be crap... it is free isn't it and you get what you pay for....
Most consumers such as myself will be waiting till there is a clear winner, by that time there will be a new much better format out. Remember Laser Disk or BetaMax.
Most people who i know who aren't sony fanboys and want to purchase a PS3 (common Consumer) do not even know what blueRay is or do they care about watching movies on the PS3. they just want to play games.
Any time someone says anything negative about the PS3 you jump all over them all the time and claim they are a fanboy.. who are you fooling. your a true Sony Fanboy
It only has the potential to play games.. it is really a blue-Ray player and computer. And according to sony they would sell out even if there were no games.