I will be able to play Psychonauts 2 via Gamepass when it launches. However, I still plan on buying a physical copy of the game to collect. Gamepass doesn’t stop you from buying games. You aren’t forced to subscribe to it.
My Nintendo Switch standard has poor Wi-fi connectivity compared to my other consoles and computer electronics. For example my Switch when in a different room from my router would often have 3 bars of signal strength. My laptop and iPhone in comparison would read 5 bars anywhere in the house.
A lot of AAA titles are 10-15 hrs in length. Especially AAA games that aren’t RPGs or open-world. I don’t think Kena’s playtime needs any special praise.
Nintendo wants higher than average profit margins on their consoles. Hence the Switch OLED isn’t replacing the original Switch as a standard model. The Switch OLED is a false premium model. People are comparing Nintendo to Apple. However, Apple products are often well made, and their phones are generally high end [MacBooks not so much].
Killer Instinct, Battletoads and Perfect Dark all got rebooted. Therefore, a reboot of another Rare title wouldn’t surprise me.
Yet The Coalition, 343i and Turn 10 are bound to one IP each. All the other Xbox Studios seem to have much more creative freedom. I don’t think there is anything wrong with making sequels to games in long running franchises. Especially, when the games do well and fans want more.
BF 2042 should be a free-to-play title.
The console revisions done my Sony and Microsoft often had associated permanent price drops.
I wonder how much it would have cost Microsoft to buy out the exclusivity deals of Death Loop and Ghost Wire Tokyo? Sony likely put a lot of funding into both titles.
Imagine if Microsoft kept selling the original Xbox One [without a price drop] alongside a $50 more Xbox One S. The Switch OLED should be replacing the standard Switch. However, Nintendo decided to release a more expensive SKU that doesn’t offer premium features, unlike the Xbox One X and PS4 pro.
It lacks direct competition as handheld.
A portable device that matches the now 7+ year old PS4 and XB1would be difficult and expensive to produce. Even the massive PS5 and series X don’t consistently run games at non-dynamic 4k. It would be more reasonable to expect a handheld that could consistently run modern games at 1080p than 4k or even 1440p.
Even though I generally don’t play Capcom’s titles. It’s good to see Capcom doing well. At the start of the 8th gen Capcom was struggling.
About 30
The Switch OLED seems like a replacement model for the current Switch. The two older switch models logically should have had a permanent price drop by now. The production cost of has certainly dropped as the system is 4 years old, and it’s tech is even older.
However, the Switch OLED by not replacing the standard Switch allows Nintendo to keep the price of their old hardware up with increasing profit margins. The Switch OLED is being solid as premium handheld without actu...
Wasn’t the new Switch supposed to be a 4k machine, lol 😂
I haven’t bought a Call of Duty game since Black Ops 3 . Call of Duty won’t be cluttering up the SSDs of either my PlayStation 5 or Series X.
Why do the newer Call of Duty games have such massive install sizes?
Control is the first Remedy game I didn’t like. I played it for 5 hrs before uninstalling. The combat felt lacking, the environment and world was bland. Plus the story was confusing.
Switch OLED has a production cost only $10 more than the Switch standard to make. $50 price difference isn’t justified.
https://www.google.com/amp/...