It's not in any of the titles or summaries. Clickbait.
That's the point. The article is calling them "exclusives" when they should call it "console exclusive".
Same but with differences. Sony does not release all their games on PC and when they do they come multiple years later.
Not a single "exclusive" on there.
This comment right here is all you need to know about this site. Only their opinions are allowed.
Posting your own articles and then arguing with readers who disagree with you and calling them fools and other names. I've never seen you admit to being wrong or changing your opinion through these discussions. You're just there to stir up trouble and drama. I guess you call that integrity.
You seriously above tried to compare this to an MMO ... ridiculous. Just because an MMO is changing doesn't mean it was never a fully fledged game to begin with. That is...
Nah, just pounding that word into your skull until maybe one day you'll actually have some integrity.
Look at the shill Abriael, in here calling people fools.
They started crowd-funding October 2012. The initial projected release date at that time was 2014
So, it doesn't matter if they ever release the game. They have been collecting money from fools for 11 years and are 9 years passed the original anticipated release date.
Selling ships in game for thousands of dollars.
Says we don't know what a scam is.
This needs some major clarification. If the Q&A was about Valhalla then are we sure it wasn't a "only ask questions about Valhalla" thing and not specifically "don't ask about GOW remake"?
Sony never called it a rogue like. They said it was inspired by them, which by your own admissions is indeed true.
You also seem to be reviewing this as if it is some full game instead of a fucking free DLC.
I guess they want a pat on the back for adding in the basics.
This article should be rejected as misinformation. It is coming to conclusions, that have already been proven false, based on documents that are many years old at this point.
The article didn't provide any example for how it was ahead of its time? Always online was ahead of its time? No, that's stupid and still is. What else did it offer? Absolutely nothing.
They added support for paid mods,Steam Deck and ultra wide monitors and this site comes to the conclusion they don't want modders making mods any more?
What?
Exactly right. On top of what you said... Bethesda were the ones to give all the expectations of the game. They failed to deliver on things and failed to meet their hype.
That's a poorly worded headline.
Immediately falls through world after that amazing intro scene. 10/10.
Why does it show 6/10 approvals, but still showing up in main feed?
This was already posted 3 days ago.
https://n4g.com/news/257696...
What a pointless article. Who thought you would "lose them"? That has never happened.
Anyone who cares about trophies would rather be able to gain them a 2nd time, which is what the common practice is in this situation.