Reviewers aren't applying it is the point.
Order 1886 had graphics that were way ahead of its time. Also had excellent gameplay. But it was absolutely ripped to shreds in reviews based on the shortness of the game and some repetitiveness of some fights. For some reason those things don't apply to HB.
It is the same as the first game. You don't need to have played it to judge it.
You ran went back to an MMO where you pay $15 a month to do the same thing over n over?
In those regions in which they took the game down... that was only for new purchases. Anyone who already bought it could play just fine.
Why are you posting this blatantly false article? Oh we know why.
Is this going to be the new thing thing? Articles about Steam reviews? Which of course was in response to the false article about the review bombings in the first place.
Top selling Steam game. Shows you how pathetic gamers are. All talk. Still buying the game.
Gamers want to say review sites are disingenuous with false high scores. But this is okay? Right.
Gamers are the biggest cry babies of all.
You're quoting a change from a generic FAQ on their support page (which I've linked below). That is not the TOS for Helldivers 2.
https://www.playstation.com...
What terms did they change? The PSN requirement was there from Day 1. It was listed on the Steam page from Day 1. The requirement was only temporarily disabled because there were some issues. Users were told at the time that it was a temporary change and that it would be required later on.
They didn't change anything.
So you've never created an account for other companies or publishers? Tell us more lies.
Just Steam right (for some reason that is okay with you).
Get your facts straight too. They didn't change the TOS.
No one has had anything revoked.
Very few are getting refunded. You don't even have a valid argument at this time because nothing has changed yet. It doesn't even apply until the 30th.
The requirement has been there since day 1. Then they had some issues and they temporarily allowed it without an account, but also specifically stated that it was a temporary measure and would be required in the future.
I find it very doubtful that Microsoft is going attempt to do this. We all know they're exiting the console hardware business so why would they attempt this? In order for Xbox games to run on a handheld, that system would be expensive as hell and it wouldn't sell.
Don't you need a story in the first place to have a "story expansion"?
The logic in the article and all the tweets are ignoring one obvious thing, which others have pointed out.
There are way more other "obscene" costumes. So what is their logic that Sony made them change this one and not the others?
They couldn't even wait for the developer to respond. The developer who already had to shoot down the censor rumor about the bunny costume. I'm sure they'll say Sony censored the devs too, just kidding t...
Xbox had a community-first image? Since when?
Not a single person is upset or even disagreeing that this game has the best graphics. So what are you talking about?