CRank: 5Score: 39590

No one should be surprised. Microsoft will sell their branding to anything.

People made fun of the Series X looking like a refrigerator, so they literally create a fridge and you clowns at it up. Fridge that can keep 2 cans slightly cold and can't be left on all the time.

760d ago 25 agree2 disagreeView comment

"corrupted"? No, it just blocked it.

It doesn't run unless the game is running. Stop repeating your lies.

760d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Gameguard only runs when the game runs for this game. Take your conspiracy BS elsewhere.

760d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

@theindiearmy

No I have no source, I call it common sense. The developer has joked about going bankrupt, complained about their server costs and have now said they have a severe lack of staff.

You think they have good money coming in from MS? Riiiiiiight.

760d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

@Michiel1989

I hope you didn't take me literal about pennies.

But it is common knowledge that they have to pay more for well know games, franchises, publishers, etc.

This was a game that hardly anyone knew was coming. It had zero expectations. It is in beta.

No way MS paid a lot for it.

760d ago 2 agree7 disagreeView comment

Not sure why downvotes. This game came out of no where. Microsoft probably pennies for it to be on GP.

So they severely missed out on those sales.

761d ago 8 agree11 disagreeView comment

If they bring all their games to Playstation, then their own console is dead in the water.

761d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Anyone thinking GP is coming to other consoles is living in a dream world.

You have to understand that there are contracts between Microsoft and all the game makers. Those would all have to be redone and they'd have to pay a shit ton of money. If they paid 10 million to a company to get a game on Xbox... they'd have to pay another 30 million to allow it on Playstation.

763d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Kind of a misleading comparison. They were simply talking about the game being melee oriented and more of an open world. I wouldn't compare a game to a soulslike based on that.

767d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Also as expected, you're in the comments of your own submission arguing, stirring up drama and insulting readers.

That's why no one likes you. You have no integrity which you show in multiple ways.

771d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Blizzard was dragged down by Activision.

So, they they pick someone who was in charge of COD eSports to run Blizzard.

Genius.

773d ago 27 agree4 disagreeView comment

Monkeys on the internet don't understand what businesses care about. Let's say 8 out of 10 people prefer non-GaaS. If those 2 out of 10 actually bring in more money than those other 8... guess what? GaaS it is.

So until you all convince people to stop buying that shit and all the MT, it will never go away.

780d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm so confused about people saying this game looks great graphically... what exactly? Looks last gen and clunky.

783d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

He was only scoring the new content - "The final score refers strictly to the DLC but does not reflect on the rest of the overall game."

785d ago 11 agree1 disagreeView comment

72 positive reviews, 3 mixed reviews and 1 negative review.... and you clowns think this 4/10 is the only accurate review. The reviewer even admitted they were only scoring the "DLC" which doesn't make any sense to do in this case because it isn't DLC.

785d ago 36 agree22 disagreeView comment

Naughty Dog already told us, this isn't a rumor or news.

785d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Yes, more. Valhalla had more new story. That doesn't mean it had more.

This remaster has added:

No Return Mode.
Speedrun Mode.
Guitar Free Play Mode.
Lost Levels.
Outfits & Skins.
Director's Commentary.
Graphics and Performance Enhancements.
Full DualSense support.

785d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

So Sony shouldn't do that because you have OCD? Not exactly a fair argument.

785d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I still question why they made that free.

Regardless, so what? This has more. What is your argument that it should be free?

785d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

"I care about trophies, but don’t necessarily want to sink my time into getting them all over again, so for me this is a positive." - then just don't? It doesn't harm you.

Why would you be against being able to earn them again?

786d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment