It doesn't matter. These playstation fans are gonna be negative regardless.
You mean most playstation only gamers don't care about the brand.
Microsoft is making billions so if gamers don't care about it they have a strange way of showing it. Some of you here don't have a clue as to what you're talking about. The Xbox brand has millions of supporters. Not nearly as many as sony but they don't need to. Apple is the number one smart phone maker in the world but that doesn't mean samsung isn't having any success. Microsoft ...
I think I played that game. It called Infamous or Infamous Secon son
You just just stick to playing no man's sky. Starfield is different which isn't a bad thing.
Lol..this is an ignorant post.You have no idea what you're taking about.
That's not true. Xbox was never down.
Neither would playstation so whats the point? Sony finances playstation and Microsoft finances xbox. That's how business works.
It's obvious that many of you dont pay attention when Microsoft post their quarterly results. The only area where they aren't doing good is the hardware which doesn't make much money anyway. Other than that they're making a lot of money off software and services. Just Google it and you will see.
Lol...why do people take one or two sentences from an article and post them just to get hits. Who approves this crap?
Lol..I agree because it didn't take 500 million to make. That BS was shot down way before it was released by the project lead. Don't confuse the budget for the game with development cost.
Playstation leadership has been very disappointing lately.
I dont think so.🤣
If you're planning on getting a series x for 360 games then you're not done with them.
No issues with mine.
I have no doubt that it's a great game like the first one. It deserves praise. The problem i see in this is Metacritic picks and chooses which reviews it wants to include. If you choose to add a 100 or 95 score from a website for one game why would you not include it for another. I've seen certain games get more perfect and low scores than what they post on the site. I've also seen reviews that don't use a score system but metacritic decides to give it a score. They really n...
Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.
No they don't.
"I think most of these 1st party devs wish most of their games were multiplat on both sides."
That is definitely true. I've read interviews where former 1st party devs members wanted their games on more than one platform. It's already happening but in the future I think we'll more 1st party titles go multiplat. Microsoft is already doing it. Even sony is starting to.
Nah, it's not about defending. Some games don't live up to the hype. It's nothing new. Sony and Microsoft publish some good and some not so good games. It's more about the double standard that some claim doesn't exist.
So what? Playstation sites blasted Concord. That is a 400 million dollar waste. Or did you people think that was gonna be forgotten quickly.