I think Move has potential. (starts to talk about his invisioned Gladiator/Medieval/Elder Scrolls type rpg starting the PS Move).
It would be EPIC! At least give me a real gladiator style game, or a boxing game. Yeah there's sports champions and The fight(I like both), but they can do better.
I kind of figured that people would bore of this game quickly. It is a good game, but I think half the gamers that bought this imagined it to be a police style GTA.
I didn't get it cause' I was worried about replay value after finishing it once or twice.
Doesn't sound like it has any free-roaming options, so I figure I'll just wait for a price drop. $30 range.
It worked well in The Saboteur, only there were splashes of color, such as red.
At least until you started progressing in the game.
Sorry, but some of you hackers messed stuff up for everyone. Besides, I personally got a console to play games, I don't give a damn about apps, and I don't care about homebrew ANYTHING.
These guys need to go and build their own system or something.
Not this shit again. Someone find him/her and put an end to them quickly.
I don't see how the Move could be used with a game like this honestly.
I still want to see a hack/slash rpg-ish game for the Move! Someone get to it!!
This is stupid. Generally move support is optional. If you don't want to play with Move, WHY WOULD IT BOTHER YOU IF SOMEONE ELSE DOES?
What is wrong with this generation of gamers, seriously.
I just hope the style is more Morrowind than Oblivion. Morrowind made it actually feel as if you were in a huge, dangerous world ripe for exploring.
Oblivion...sorta.
It wasn't just that though, Morrowind seemed a hell of a lot more that made it seem like an actual world...political stuff and such. Factions had meaning.
Oblivion...factions were just a way to get added goodies and that was that.
I'd like to s...
Imagine if this had Move support on PS3. If you've played Gladiators and Archery from Sports Champions, you'd know it's doable...and very well so.
Day one for me too. This took the place of GTA for me, and will continue to do so until GTA becomes fun again.
I just hope Saint's Row doesn't get TOO silly.
I wish they would hurry up and do a medieval style game. Gladiators and Archery from Sports Champions has painted a promising future with that style of game with Move.
Swords, shields, bows and arrows, crossbows, magic, dragons, etc.
Just imagine an rpg-style game via move. Hell, let it scan your face and you can appear in cutscenes.
Why has this not been done yet? No, instead everyone wants to use guns...come on, ppl should be SICK of...
You know what I would really like to see? Anyone ever play RAD for PS2? I'd LOVE an updated PS3 version of that. The game had potential....if only they had explored it more.
I couldn't give two poops about what a gaming review site has to say. You wanna know what works? Go to amazon and read user reviews. Those will help a lot more generally.
Anyway, I was ALL set for getting this game, but I don't think it's what I think it is.
Can you still play it after the story is done? Can you stop random crimes? Can you wander about where you want and for how long you please? Can you deviate from the story and be a not-so-...
Just wanted to say, I don't play sports games(with the exception of something like Fight Night once every blue moon), and I'm not big on multiplayer games either.
It's pretty much like Valk says. In regards to RPGs, I can go back and replay many times, especially if it's a game like Dragon Age. Various parts of the story can change.
Just because a game can take a long time to complete, doesn't mean it has lots of replay value. As it ...
I've been a gamer longer than some of you I bet, and I have NOT played Infamous(other than a demo). Why? Because I don't buy games that have little replay value.
So get off that crap about "any real gamer would already have these".
I can sum this up for you real quick, and with a lot less paragraphs.
Since you already have the games and such they are offering, be happy for those who get to try them for the first time.
Just because you have played them doesn't mean everyone else has, and just because you spend a lot of money doesn't entitle you to a thing.
Grow up. If what you say is right, then it's clear you can afford whatever games and toys you w...
Warhawk was the first multiplayer only game I ever bought. It was almost a regret till I got the hang of things.
In case some of you don't know, the game IS supposed to have a story of some kind. The PS1 version did.
Personally I think it's lazy if they(devs) don't try to explain why people are at war with each other. "Just because" is lame.
That was honestly one of the problems I had with Warhawk.
Witcher was probably the last rpg I truly enjoyed. They did a damn good job with it. A game like that is worth every penny.
Maybe if devs made games worth the price they are asking. This is just me, but I base whether I buy a game new or used by what it has to offer.
A shooter with a 5-8 hour single player...used...if I even buy at all.
Few games warrant my $60.The only ones that do have either near infinite replay value(such as Rockband) or offer a nice, long single player game (rpgs usually). Games that rely on mulitplayer can wait till a price drop...$40 or $30.
...
I'm gonna have to disagree with you on this. The room I game in is damn near a closet and I have no trouble playing anything so far.