There are questions that must be answered before we can really say who would win in this crossover. For example, would Medusa's head affect Hulk?
Also, seeing as how Kratos killed the Fates, and therefore has access to the tower of the Fates, what would happen if Kratos simply cut Hulk's thread?
And then there is the Blade of Olympus. Would that drain Hulk's power?
I didn't realize that console gaming needed saving in the first place.
Electricity was not invented. It was discovered.
You lost the argument before you started Don. His beard automatically makes him right.
I don't see the point of an experience boost. Normal through Hell is already easy enough.
If they release it on the PS4 I will buy it. If not I will Gamefly it, if I am still playing PS3 games at all after the PS4 releases.
@4
If it launches at $500 I am going to buy two of them. One for me and one for my brother. That really isn't an unreasonable price.
It's funny that you are getting disagrees when you didn't even name the King of Exclusives. It means the people disagreeing with you assume the King of Exclusives is whichever system they don't have, and they don't want to face that ugly truth.
If it is true that PS4 games will all be remote playable on the Vita, then that is actually enough to justify the purchase for me.
I stopped paying for cable a long time ago. Between Netflix, Hulu Plus, and Amazon Instant Video (to say nothing of other services such as SEN, VUDU, iTunes, and Crackle) I pretty much have access to whatever I want to watch, for a lot less expense than paying for cable.
@Aceman18
If everyone had enough sense to do the math, "rent to own" places wouldn't exist.
To the article author:
These days just about anything gets interpreted as an affront. I realize that it is a cost-cutting measure that is mostly opposed by a vocal minority. You take it as an offense. That probably means I am happier than you.
@2
The PS3 has custom architecture, which makes it inherently more expensive to manufacture than the x86 architecture that the PS4 will contain. Even though the PS4 is newer, it could still have an equivalent price point.
I have been playing video games for 25 years now and I can tell you that the price of games has remained consistent the entire time. New games were about $30 back in the 80's, which is the equivalent of $60 today.
"Always online" is certainly an awful idea, but come on, clearly tofu bacon is the worst idea ever.
Of course I am thinking about myself. I am the center of my universe, until such time as I meet someone who will become the new center of my universe. Lower sales is not my concern. That is something the developers and publishers will have to address. I am simply interested in getting those games because I want to play them.
The lack of backward compatibility is not really an issue for me. I have been playing video games since 1988, so I am pretty used to consoles not being backward compatible. I will still have a PS3 when I get a PS4, but most likely I am going to spend my gaming time just playing the new games anyway.
Would I like backward compatibility? Sure. I would even be willing to pay a premium for it. The Earth will continue revolving around the Sun without it though.
I understand the principal behind the outcry against the always-online requirement, and in fact I agree with it. That being said, I am still going to get the games. I have a stable internet connection that is always on, so that type of requirement really doesn't affect me in any way.
The Wii-U uses an AMD graphics processor as well.
I'm not getting carried away. Aside from the Fates comment, the items I mentioned are part of Kratos' arsenal. Assuming a random encounter, there is a reasonable chance that Kratos will have Medusa's head or the Blade of Olympus. There is not a reasonable chance that the Hulk will have the Infinity Gauntlet.