^ Comment of the year.
Ya like I said above it would have to be a new game not a port. I did not word my first comment very well. Also Dark Souls needs to get PS Move support that would be sick.
I was not talking about Demon Souls it self of course, it would be a new game and a new experience. They could call it Shadow Souls or something. I'm sure they could make good use of the touch screen and even use the two cams for a boss fight that is in augmented reality. Or jerking the device to the left or right to roll quickly.
He might have been playing with his sister.
You know, Demon Souls should have a PS Vita version made. From Software to my knowledge has never made a handheld game. A game like Demon Souls on the Vita would help not only push it in Japan, but the hardcore US and EU followers of the game would be very interested in playing it as well.
They can't use HDMI. I use to have the Intensity Pro from Black Magic and I found out that the HDMI signal is encrypted to prevent recording. You can record with HDMI with the right tools but its not cheep. Google around and you will find out why.
Its kind of sad, CPU's GPU's and all that are getting so much better yet I swear that the batteries have not advanced at all or at least even close to as much.
And yes that is just fine. I'v all the hand helds I had the most I ever played one in a single go was the old Pokemon games when I was a kid when we drove to my grandmas which was a 8 hour drive. I don't ever see myself now having 3-5 hours of free time at any given moment to really worry about it.
I think it is a good idea. Rewards people who do buy games new, every company right now is trying to fight used game sales in any way they can. I know many people like used games because of the lower price but remember the guys that made the game get no $$ from that. Then people complain when a studio goes under or a game they like does not get a second in the series. With how much it cost to make games and how competitive the market is they really do need every dollar they can to grow and ex...
I'd not mind paying $60 for a hard copy and maybe $50 for a digital. IF the games are good then cost is not that big of deal. Games like UC3 I'd pay more then what they are asking, same with Skyrim. So it all depends on the quality of the game and if that quality justifies the price.
<3
Why can't we all just be friends?
That is the issue with betas, there should be issues lots of them in fact, the point of them is to find and fix as many of them before the game launches. Betas are not for us, they are a tool developers can use to fine tune there product and get feedback.
Not sure what looks bad about it, the aircraft models are very well done and the destruction for them is also top notch. I plan to get it day one the game play was great, that and the music for it has been some of the best I heard in a long time.
More or less, I mean you can just adjust your TV's brightness and contrast to make one look like the other. I did notice that on the face mask the PS3 version had better AA. You could see the jagged lines on the 360 version. But you would never know it was there unless you looked at it with a microscope.
Really hope it is some kind of new game plus. Not sure why they did not add that in the first place.
Ya I am not too worried. Looking at how good just the first wave of games are for the PSV just wait to see them a year or two from now. One question though is how much will games cost? I'd expect them to be a little higher then the PSP games.
Naw I been playing this since it was called Air Combat on the PS1, I been waiting for a new AC game for years, they are doing some sick things with this game and it has me even more excited then Uncharted 3. About time we get a good flying game again. HAWX just did not cut it.
Ya MGS2's port was done by SK and also MGS3 is on the 3DS or soon will be, don't forget Metal Gear started on the old Nentendo systems. Never got why people thought it was exclusive.
Sony has said that they like to show games at E3, FW updates they can talk about when they like for MS it is different since they are a Software not an entertainment company. At the same time Sony must know the main reason people stick to the Xbox is XBL. I don't see why they would not want to challenge MS on that front. I personal expect to see some decent updates of PSN this year.
People worry to much about hardware launches, it takes about a good year most of the time till we start to see software for the systems, you have to remember that the Vita was not in the hands of every Dev before the system came out. Sony only lets I guess you can say top tier devs get a hold of the system first. Even then they have to take the time to learn the Dev kit and tools, come up with a prototype for a game, get it approved, start production, ect... The fact that the Vita on its own...