Well it's not like they left out MGS3 costumes from the base game.
I remember a time when expansion packs were a thing, and people were happy to pay for devs continuing to work on and expand the games they love. Now everyone seems to demand that devs sell it for its base price, patch it, and then either continue to work on it for free, or move on to the next game.
Some DLC releases are unacceptable. This is not one of them. The game is complete without it...
Men like looking at scantily-clad women.
Men are the primary audience for action games (as with action movies; we just have different tastes).
Therefore, happiness is created by including scantily-clad women in action games, like Quiet. I do not see a problem.
I swear feminists are even more obnoxious than religious fundamentalists; both groups seem to be more concerned with telling other people what they can and can't do than tolerating ...
Because all they can think about is sex, sexuality, and gender. Their lives revolve around physical contact with other human beings, as if they have nothing else going for them.
They need to get out more.
A transgender woman is a man who is living as a woman (often undergoing hormone treatment). "Trans woman" is just an abbreviated aversion of it.
You don't know what you're talking about, or you're trolling. In fact, comparing such an innocent term to the "N" word is quite racist, so I'm tempted to report your post for that.
Anything that angers feminists makes me happy,
The Long Dark is a survival sim, along the lines of The Forest, ARK, 7Days, and Stranded Deep.
I'm a bit disappointed. Different content provides an incentive to play as a character of the opposite gender in a second playthrough! :p
Personally I prefer playing male characters, but that's just my own inclination.
I think it is easier to empathise with the main character if they have more similarities to yourself (and gender is a pretty big thing in the real world, and not the fantasy world which many feminists like to imagine).
I'm happy for female gamers, as they will surely find it more fun to play as characters of their own gender.
6-7 hours isn't that bad.
Why not just wait 4-5 years between every Assassin's Creed game you purchase?
If you had done that, you would have jumped from AC2 straight to Black Flag. Was that not a huge leap?
OK, I know I am going to get hordes of people downvoting me for this, but annual releases aren't bad if they have enough funding and a large enough team behind them.
Some people say they are buggy. These bugs invariably get fixed, and if you can't handle them, just get a refund and buy the game later when it is fixed (not all of us even get the same bugs). I do this all the time, and I don't understand how others lack the self-control to do so as well. It's no...
Unless the fours were rounded down.
For example maybe they're 4.2/5, which makes 4.2*4/20, which is 16.8 but rounds up to 17/20.
;)
Crusader Kings 2.
Minecraft.
Mount and blade bannerlord.
I have over 1000 hrs in CK2.
"Bad ass" women do not interest me.
I prefer those with a "good ass" ;)
@Pandamobile
Robtion makes a good point.
The thing is that multiplayer and single player are radically different experiences.
MP is like playing a sport with your friends (or strangers), while single player is like reading a book. Games essentially are evolutions of these very different age-old activities.
Neither is better or worse, but we all have our preferences.
I only buy these sort of games if they have single player campaigns.
I quite liked Mass Effect 3 combat.
But I'm not so fussed. I'm far more concerned about the story and characters being too cheesy/moralistic/(SJW-ish).
@ Seafort
The Witcher 3 sold well and Assassin's Creed games sell well. So do Bethesda games.
But are they doing as well as they might have done if piracy did not exist? Might they outsell major multiplayer games?
Business-people usually make evidence-based decisions, and there is a reason why all the major publishers have increasingly been shunning single-player. They have to be able to make money (at least break even) on average, or bel...
Punish this game with your wallets, and let EA know why. Business types take internet rage more seriously than you may think.
Many real people are born ugly. That's not their fault. We can't do much about it with current technology.
Fictional characters can be made attractive. It is a conscious decision to make a fictional character ugly, and that has to be justified in some way. In a game reflective of the real world, ugly fictional characters make sense. If it is a story point then it makes sense. In a zany fighting game, there is no justification for ugly characters, so both male and fema...