People waited 10 years, paid $60, and then just want the whole experience to end asap, are we not supposed to want a game last longer instead? Not saying it is right or wrong, just don't understand the logic behind it.
While 7GB day one patch is bad, it is better than getting a broken game and wait weeks/months for a patch. I would rather developers keep patching their games non-stop, than being lazy and stop supporting their games too soon. Let's focus on if the game is actually good or not, are we running out of things to complain?
Gamingbolt
Gamingbolt always try so hard, good efforts!!
Nooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!
The problem is no one bothers reading articles on N4G anymore, it was just an email from customer support explaining the confusion... then it became "Sony blames media"
To understand why @dothate comment is true, please refer to the Xbox fanboy article "What's Missing from PS4 Pro is What's Important" on N4G posted few days ago
Or you can call it "What Sony has are always not important" @@
"What's Missing from PS4 Pro is What's Important" - perfectly describe the mentality of xbox fanboys
If PS4 Pro has 10TF and UHD blu-ray, the most important thing to them would be the price, they would bash the premium price like there is no tomorrow.
@slate91
Do you really need to ask why a dev wants more people to play their games? Some people will be eager to try their shinny PS4Pro with games that support 4k, and they will pick from the list of games that support 4k.
Xbox Fanboy logic examples:
- Kinect - voice commands are awesome
- PSVR - gimmick
- Upscale from 900p to 4k - yay, we can do 4k
- Upscale from 1080p+ to 4k - it is not even true 4k
- Scorpio 6TF over PS4Pro 4.2TF (for unknown price difference) - we have the best console
- PS4Pro 4.2TF over XBox One S 1.4TF (for $50 more) - we have UHD blu-ray
So 3 years ago, they prefer to pay $150 more for...
you can adjust the angle on the original one as well
I would guess the console itself is a mobile device for you to take it outside with you, then when you are at home, you plug in the external device for additional power to play on TV.
@yeahokwhatever - I don't think they would launch it at the same time, they want people to buy both, not choosing one of the two. It can easily adds up to over $1k to get both, especially if you are buying some accessories and games as well, I can't imagine many people would rush in to spend $1k in the same month. Not to mention it would also makes people believe PS4 is not strong enough for PSVR, by releasing PS4Neo at the same time.
This is good for Microsoft but extremely bad for the xbox brand, this is basically telling all XBox One owners... "The machine you bought to play XBox One exclusives is now just a low-end pc that requires you to pay $50 per year to play online", how is this a good thing?
I am curious, for those who say there are no differences between 900p and 1080p, are the developers who make 1080p games for Xbox one doing something stupid then? Since they are wasting resources on resolution instead of graphic effects, perhaps you all need to start a petition, let them know you guys don't want any 1080p games, since there are no differences.
I don't see anything wrong with it, DLC means downloadable content, and it is a downloadable content.
@starchild
Exclusive deal happens everywhere, asking for Witcher 1 & 2 ports on PS4 is not same as asking for a Sony published game on PC. Either way I don't why bloodborne is even mentioned, I am just saying let gamers ask for what they want, don't tell people what to do because that person think it is not ok.
@kingjosh1876
Just a suggestion. How about you mind your own business and let people ask for what they want? Or you think people have no rights to ask for what THEY want because YOU don't like it?
@alb1899
You try too hard, you are basically begging other people to hate the game in every The Order 1886 article. Have nothing better to do?
Wow...