I feel the same, its hivemind mentality. The constant need for validation that a game they like is a 9+ or the opposite, a game they don't like is utter trash even when it's pretty decent to justify them not buying it. I think a lot of people here would enjoy some games they now deem "trash" if they just give it a try with a different mindset.
i didn't play 3 on launch, but 1 and 2 were fine on launch for me.
is it finally time for Ni No Kuni 3?
I think you're confusing Redfall with Anakin Skywalker, he was the one to bring balance to the force, not Redfall.
or players number go down for every live service game after hitting peak numbers at launch, stop acting like helldivers is a failure or something, it's the opposite. Unbelievable how you can see things so black and white.
Like on twitter when you hear one negative thing and people immediately go, YEAH ITS DEAD
this make me question you know what that word means.
he just wants to show off that if he doesn't like something, he still wants it but just doesnt wanna pay for it. Let him have his moment
very cool
mate... you already compared him to a guy that was 16 years older than him and then ask why he hasnt worked in the industry as long as kojima. Time exists.
Do you really think all of ND will let Neill flaunt around if he didn't have a severe impact on how the game turned out? So you're saying the rest of ND is stupid that they're playing along with his masterplan to take over ND.
It's pretty obvious from your comment you're just salty ...
exactly the reason I'm never gonna play Marvel RIvals, they did some of the most shady shit with that game.
netease being netease
I don't know why anyone would work with NetEase or Tencent, a quick buck and then you get tossed to the side
just cause he made one game that you didn't completely like?
from this small snippet of gameplay, this honestly looks the closest to Origins than any other DA, just only 3rd person. Pretty slow and quite methodical, but these are cherrypicked moments so will have to wait and see, but this looks infinitely better than that first trailer.
The ui I also have a big issue with though, it feels way too busy. I'm at least somewhat interested to see more of the game now.
from the limited footage we saw, Kingdoms of amalur was way more appealing in its artstyle for me. I can't help but feel like the new DA looks like a mobile game with an insanely high budget
@apocalypse which streamer hurt you?
because naughty dog is one of their best studios and has been for years and have way more say in what they want to do, sony bought this studio specifically to make a live service game, thats why.
and consoles in general held the industry back, so I don't see how this is such a big issue all of a sudden. Having to develop for way weaker hardware has always been the case with consoles. When a console is in it's 5th year, it's running on 6-7 year old hardware which at that time wasn't even the best out there so not sure how this now is a big deal all of a sudden
it's just not a good game. This game would have failed if it was singleplayer with the same type of gameplay anyway, so this is the worst example to gage how gaas would do for them. If there's an amazing one that will sell like shit, then you got a point.
This is basically asking people why they aren't hungry after feeding them a turd.
rectifying what exactly? they were meant to supplement their sp games offering, not replace it and with how much money they pumped on it and the immense success other companies have with gaas games, I don't think they will stop trying to succeed in that space.
also proof people here get triggered way too easily