Me too. Fallout NV was better than fallout 3.
I'm just curious how the game opens up?
All you do is travel from planet to planet, harvesting, scanning, naming and uploading.
There is just nothing to do beyond that. The survival aspects are non existent. It calls itself a survival game but I can't build shelters or bases on planets and don't need to eat or sleep. Having health bars for toxic, radioactive or cold planets does not make it survival.
Anyone wanting a decent...
I agree to some extent. The game is supposed to be a survival game but there is nothing survival about it. Its just about naming planets and discoveries and uploading them. There seems to be no point in discovering planets because you can't build on them.
There are much better survival games out there console. 7 days to die, Subnautica and even Minecraft are all better survival games. As for space exploration games, Elite Dangerous is far better.
Whil...
Still haven't watched Sony's E3 so don't know which was best but this year I found the xbox show to be poor.
Way too much PC talk and the Minecraft segment wasn't even about consoles at all. I didn't watch the xbox show to see news about the mobile and windows 10 versions of minecraft. I wanted to news on xbox games. If it wasn't for the fact they announced project skorpio I would have thought MS didn't care about xbox at all.
Would have preferred a Morrowind remaster.
It's the game that would have benefited most from a remaster considering it's something like 14 years old.
It's also the best Elder Scrolls game ever.
Both consoles are still great buys especially if you have no internet or a very slow internet.
Also the graphics quality for some games are still good by todays standards too.
Until they start combining digital sales with retail we will never get an idea on how well games really sell.
I and some of my friends rarely buy games on disc now due to the inconvenience of having to insert disc whenever you want to play. There is also the inconvenience of having to buy 2 copies of the game if you have 2 consoles in your household.
Discs aren't even worth collecting any more due to them having no manuals included.
...
Yes, Until Dawn is one of Sony's best exclusives. Although it's probably not for everyone
Who cares which console was better?
They were both great in my eyes.
In some ways I preferred them to current gen console. There was none of these 40GB installs or 10GB patches for a start.
Unfortunately MS have had no choice but to bring a more powerful model out after the PS4.5 was announced.
Personally I think both consoles should have stuck with the current models or just brought a slim out that run games the same.
Going to be an expensive time for those of us who own both consoles as the temptation to buy the upgraded models will be strong especially when games that take advantage of the extra power are released.
It plays the same on both 360 and xbox one and there is no control delay for me
Any lag you get is down to the fact the game uses a p2p system when games are hosted on a players consoles. You are just as likely to get lag playing on an actual 360.
Yes people have a right to their own opinions on games.
I personally think it's a great game but for me the long repetitive gun battles brought it down. There were some sections that you simply couldn't use stealth and were forced into those annoying long gun battles with loads of enemies. One mistake and you had to reload and do the whole thing again. It gets repetitive reloading checkpoints and doing the gun battles over and over again.
There a...
Give me gameplay over graphics any day. And there is more to good graphics than resolution.
The way some people go on about 1080p is as though you have to have 1080p to have great graphics.
That's like saying minecraft(1080p) has better graphics than Battlefield 4(720p). Clearly it doesn't.
I chose xbox one version too for the same reasons as you. Even though I own a ps4.
Mine isn't. It gets quite loud sometimes.
Why?
What's wrong with owning both consoles?
I own both too. Both are great consoles and have their advantages over the other
And most japanese games are terrible. Most are just boring linear crap.
There are a few that are good like Dead Rising and Resident evil but they are mostly aimed at the western market and are not exclusive to Sony
Fanboys like you should get your facts straight.
It's not inferior in every way.
It's CPU is faster than the ps4's
PS4 has the best GPU
Xbox one has the best CPU
Xbox one has the best wifi adaptor
PS4 has an upgradable internal HDD. Although it has to find hard drives greater than 2TB that fit the ps4.
Xbox one can have up to 2 external HDDs connected up to 32TB per drive
Little big planet was boring.
Had it free off Sony after the PSN hack.
Played it a couple of times. Didn't see the point of it then moved on. Obviously some people liked it as it got a sequel but to me it was boring as hell.
Good news if this rumour is true.
ps4 download speeds are only a fraction of the download speeds my xbox one gets which already has 5Ghz wifi.
2.4Ghz wifi is just too congested where I live.
Although I wont be buying the slim as I don't think it's worth it if you already own a ps4, I am planning on getting the Neo and if the slim gets 5Ghz then it's a good chance the Neo will too.