There are a lot of reasons for the answer "no" here, but the most prominent is that Rockstar and Nintendo's relationship is effectively non-existent. Outside of a stray title once or twice, Rockstar's development was focused on Sony for years, slowly branched out to Microsoft, and has been ever so slowly figuring out how to do the whole PC thing. The common denominator here though is that all of these platforms attract the audience that play Rockstar games.
Nah. All Epic is doing is building a community of people that will just hang around for the free stuff. People that are happy to take free games aren't going to necessarily overlap with people willing to pay.
Whatever Epic's strategy here is, they aren't exactly doing much as a store.
They shouldn't have even made a "second" game to begin with considering the game model. It's an MMO (light on the "massive", but still) game that just segments the user base by making the full package into separate entries.
I've played about 400 hours of Destiny 2, but I'm absolutely not going to start from scratch to make the idiots feel better that don't even play the game. A Destiny 3 would prove to me that Bungie is effectively to...
Although neat, I'm not really looking to buy a game that will be stuck with Redbox stickers in a Redbox case. All fixable for cheap, but inconvenient compared to just waiting for natural price drops.
To a degree I get it, but I mean, more story and more perspectives on events that have transpired is hardly disappointing. I kind of want them to take a step back and look at world structure again before making another anyways. KH3 had some of the most cumbersome worlds to explore. I didn't have to use a guide for treasure chests in any KH game before this one, for example.
The style sold it for me, and the brand of cigarettes made for easy validation. Now that you've pulled me back in with an easy day, RIP because I'm probably gonna fail hard going forward lol
Two correct so far with my third guess submitted. Here's to hoping.
Hmm. I suppose it just comes down to the problem of whether or not someone has played the game in question then. That said, it still couldn't hurt to fully clarify what is meant by multi-platform. The current lines of thought around exclusives, console exclusives, and otherwise has really muddied up general understanding with everyone seeming to have a slightly different definition for multi-platform.
I got Wolfenstein right away based on the art style and the arm band in a picture that looked distinctly like propaganda. Once I double checked the 2019 thing, Youngblood was the obvious choice. They said, you may want to clarify what you mean by multi-platform since people are noting being thrown off by Cyber Pilot technically being multi-platform between PC and PS4. When considering that, it did make the first day a bit of a coin flip since the picture didn't distinctly scream one game ...
Nintendo doesn't lower prices unless someone is holding a gun to their head, and even then it's a reluctant choice. Doing digital sales for some $40 first party titles is the most they've done, and even then they're seeing 100% return anyways so it isn't like this is some major charity.
They didn't even try to price cut the Wii U to salvage any sales, much less do any amazing deals to try to attract anyone. It baffles me a bit when people say Nintend...
PSVR is fantastic at that price. I bought it at launch and haven't regretted a thing, especially since it took years for PC headsets to diversify enough to offer a nice deal to non-enthusiast consumers, and even now PSVR has some amazing unique experiences available on it (like Astrobot Rescue Mission). For anyone that wants a VR unit that doesn't require a PC and isn't gambling on the first wireless experiences, PSVR remains an excellent entry level headset choice.
That "dart home" line reeks of Legend of Dragoon. The Black Monster is a huge plot point in that game for Dart in particular, and the game starts with him rushing home to his town burning, causing the beginnings of a resistance.
It's been too long since I played the game to correlate the last half of the sentence, but that's a crap ton of coincidence already if it isn't LoD.
Something else related to the Black Monster that ties into...
I mean, that would be stellar. Steam is sooooooo much better than the Xbox PC app. Just downloading a game on that mess can be painful. Leveraging on Steam's existing platform would make my life far more simple.
Fair use, friendo. This is a valid parody, and without any ads to generate revenue to boot.
Gonna be blunt: this article is basically lip service to say what you're saying. I find it best to put sales in context. For example say Witcher 3 was only averaging around 100 sales a week at this point. A 999% increase suddenly isn't actually very impressive still. I want third party games to thrive on Switch, but clearly third parties with hard numbers aren't as convinced.
I looked at the article, but the problem I have is that numbers aren't actually given for Witcher. Not only are we in the calm before the storm of seasonal and big exclusive releases, so a big week for a game may literally just be 30k copies, but they only talk about the Witcher 3 sales experiencing a big resurgence, which considering how old the game is now with it not being GTA V or Mario Kart, week over week sales were likely terribly low. To put it into context, a 1000% increase over ...
Calling this the most ambitious main line Pokemon game is both correct and sad. It's the most risks they've taken since making Red and Blue back in the day, and it's still not even noteworthy improvements at the end of the day. Just what's expected, essentially.
For better or for worse, this will just be more Pokemon but with controllable camera angles. It will sell a lot for sure, but will remain disappointing to those of us waiting for the series to finall...
To be fair, you could say the PS4 sales are inflated by the Pro. The Xbox One sales inflated by the Slim and X. New iterations of a console mid cycle that offer noteworthy differences and/or improvements are almost always at least as much a tool to try to influence upgrades as entice new buyers.
Nah. Buttons are real easy to swap out, and it would be incredibly hard to validate whether or not it was opened since it's a fairly easy system to take apart. A silly mistake, but not a profitable one.
This is a kind of crappy argument because Witcher 3 is already a better optimized game that ran okay on some pretty potato PCs when it came out. GTA V came out of the gate barely running okay on PS3/360, was much better on PS4/XBO, and found its stride on competent mid range to high end PC hardware. GTA V at low on PC is a miserable experience, and based on the Witcher 3 port, that's the best you would get assuming it worked at all.
Honestly, Switch ports are like a rac...