All Channels
Popular
Awesome

LordMaim

Contributor
CRank: 8Score: 87540

Show you numbers? How about logic instead. If remasters weren't profitable, why would there be so many of them? Why would they sell if people didn't want them? I'm not digging out sales figures from every remaster ever made to show that there's a market for them. Just look at how many remasters are coming out. They're certainly not losing money doing it.

Now that said, look at the response to the original Infinite Warfare trailer. I think that Activision...

3556d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

"Everything you need to know..."

/Checks story type to find "Rumor"

/Closes window.

3556d ago 8 agree1 disagreeView comment

Yeah, the nerve of some people wanting to be paid for their hard work.

3556d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Alternately, the fact that it sells means that they're giving people what they want. You think that if remasters weren't wanted by the public that they'd keep making them?

3556d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm with Oreo.

3556d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

Right, and if you read the FAQ it says "Call of Duty®: Modern Warfare Remastered is only available through the Legacy, Legacy Pro, and Digital Deluxe editions of Call of Duty®: Infinite Warfare." Now if that changes, you would have grounds to claim false advertisement.

https://www.callofduty.com/...

3556d ago 10 agree0 disagreeView comment

Awesome. I can't wait for this game.

3558d ago 9 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think that Sean Murray has to come out with a statement, and I bet he will once the first major content patch is released and probably not before. While I enjoyed the game, it could definitely use some additional content added to the game to flesh it out.

3558d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

To be fair, they have mods running on the Xbox One. On PC there's no oversight to worry about. Ultimately it's Sony who has to maintain a level of quality and address security concerns on their network, so to say they're arrogant to disallow it is to discount their role as platform owner. Bethesda's statement is clear that they have a difference of opinion on how mods "should" work, but they never said that Sony refused to have mods at all, which means that there was...

3558d ago 13 agree3 disagreeView comment

Hahaha. Nice.

3558d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I hope this is true. I thought that Bethesda's comment "Sony has informed us they will not approve user mods the way they should work" was somewhat arrogant. Who are they to dictate to a platform how mods "should" work. It should be a discussion, and possibly with some compromise. Just because you don't get your way 100%, doesn't mean you take your football and go home.

3558d ago 24 agree23 disagreeView comment

@Oneshotv2: PC games run at higher resolution than consoles? You don't say.

You're saying that there are no native 4K games on the PS4 Pro. That is incorrect.
Not every game will be native 4K, but to say there aren't any at all is just wrong.

Incidentally, your assurances that you're buying the PS4 Pro aside, calling it underpowered and having a trash CPU would seem to undercut the integrity of your statements, lending them the a...

3558d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Just wait two years and bring out a proper generational upgrade. None of this half-step nonsense that antagonizes early adopters.

3558d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

@TheOptimist: Actually it isn't even out yet. The remastered version on Xbox One and PS4 comes out on October 28th.

3558d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

Yes, I can read. It's determining your point that is the issue. Skyrim is hardly a corridor shooter and that's going to be rendered at 4K natively on the Pro. They've already announced several games that will run 4K natively. For the others that won't, with a patch The Witcher 3 could have easily been rendered at 1440p-1800p natively before being upscaled, like the other PS4 Pro enabled games.

3559d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

What does that have to do with anything?

3559d ago 6 agree3 disagreeView comment

$800 is still about what you'd pay from zero on the PC. Assuming you have a PC that would run it to begin with. If not, then its significantly more expensive.

3559d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Unspoken: Darth got marked for spam when he trolls. Being the most recent incarnation of Rookiemonster should give you some indication as why.

@DarthMon_ster: Your campaign of niceness last year was pretty transparent, Rookie. Using it now as proof that one camp as a whole is somehow better than the other is laughable. I don't know why you're so wrapped up in advocating one side over the other, but to spend so much time making alternate accounts and trolling has g...

3559d ago 13 agree8 disagreeView comment

Yes. Its pretty normal for games. But because No Man's Sky is controversial, we have to have articles like this one to kick dirt on the grave. This author in particular has done MULTIPLE articles on this topic to get the mad clicks, because controversy equals toxic fanboy clickthroughs to drive ad revenue.

For example XCOM 2, arguably a much better game than No Man's Sky, lost 82% of its player base in the first month, and is now down by 94% since launch. These fig...

3559d ago 21 agree23 disagreeView comment

Madagascar says hi. Thanks for demonstrating how much experience you have with Uncharted 4.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

3559d ago 23 agree9 disagreeView comment