Or maybe, just maybe, people are calling bullshit because this is obviously a professional model posing with halo crap to sell halo wars based on the power of her tits. And I would say the same thing if she were posing in front of killzone crap.
Take a deep breath, calm down, and drink something... laced with ritalin.
This reminds me of "Together on the sand."
I think maybe the disagreers didn't get the joke or the sarcasm or maybe both.
EDIT: At least someone gets part of the joke.
EDIT @ supaplaya: It's kind of sad that they don't get it. It almost makes me want to explain it. But I won't. I will do this though:
"Killzone, the magic shooter, on the PS3
People say is sucks, cuz it's not original like Halo 3.
The man from the LA paper, says killzone make fanboys feel good.
But x...
All I can say is: *"Killzone, the Magic Shooter."*
EDIT: Imagine music.
I understand the math behind this scenario, and yes I took a simplistic approach to make a point. It's called playing to your audience. And it's not preening, it's me expressing my disgust and assuming the worst from this site. I apologize if I offended your delicate sensibilities.
That's a big if. Besides, it would be kind of foolish to bank on DLC for a 1 & 1/2 year old game performing well during a crowded hoilday season.
Edit below: I'm not saying they won't push for it, I'm saying, in my opinion, that pushing DLC for an old game, regardless of the quality or duration of the DLC, during the holiday rush seems foolish as the hype for newer, fresher experiences will be more pressing. I think they will either try to get the next episode out during t...
Your point is inaccurate. COD4 DLC, which was MP maps, sold well because the main draw of the game was the MP. The same is not true of GTA4. While people play GTA4 MP the primary reason to play GTA is the SP portion. As a result of a weaker MP portion, comparatively to other games like COD4, a lot of people got rid of GTA4 after beating it. And while some people may buy GTA again to play this DLC, the likelihood of that is not something most developers or publishers would bet on.
This is simple math: DLC costs 25 million and is sold at $20 a copy. It has to sell around 1.3 million copies just to begin making money for MS. And that's just for the first episode. With both episodes the likelihood of it happening goes down. It's possible, but I don't think that MS made a good deal on this one. Of course this is all in hindsight, at the time when GTA hype was enormous and the DLC was coming out a few months after release it seemed like a good deal.
EDIT: I ...
The best way to make a sonic game is to do it like SF4. 3D models on a 2D plane. The it can alternate between side scrolling and a from-behind perspective. That is the only way to make a decent Sonic game.
Does anyone care about articles asking the retarded question: "Does anyone care about the PS4 right now?"?
wrong spot. Blah Fools!
As oppossed to a big one?
Why was my comment deleted? Because I made fun of someone for resorting to the lame "you're gay" argument?
Gears, While a fun game, is essentially a very linear shooter with cover put in. Games need to take the concept of cover and design levels that are more open yet still allow for an effective cover system. Uncharted was a step in the right direction on some of its levels. The reason everyone points to gears as the "innovator of cover" is because MS marketed the hell out of it and got enough people to play it.
This guy has some valid points, however some of this stuff is just pure b1tching. Yes, PSN can be improved and it should; but making it exactly like Live is just retarded as MS has or has tried to patent half of Live to prevent others from copying it.
In about 8 years or so. Except, it will be called retirement after a long life cycle.
Sony does need to step up it's advertising. Just the other day, in one hour on cartoon network I saw at least 5 Wii commercials. Sony needs to start hitting it's markets hard.
And the "hottest" douche bag is ^^^^ (main post)