Apparently you have no idea who's directing the game?
The fact that he can't say anything about a 2011 release means it won't release until 2012. I'm sorry, but the logic simply does not follow. This is speculative at best.
Agreed, and this generation is worse than any I can remember. It's not as if Ninty or Sony are angels or anything, but at least they haven't released hardware that has a 50/50 shot of breaking down in order to be the first on the market. Add to that the fact that games are now being released in an unfinished state and then patched until the software (hopefully) begins to work properly. Don't even get me started on the thieves that charge for DLC that's on the disc (fuck you, C...
How the fuck was GOW a DMC clone?
It has nothing to do with console preference. I'm skeptical of Move and Kinect, as it seems like they both have too much lag to be taken seriously. Having said that, Kinect seems to be suffering the most. And can you really blame people for not trusting MS after they knowingly released faulty hardware?
BLA BLA BLA
Did you even read his post, you moron?
In their defense, the HD format war could have gone either way. The RROD on the other hand, well that just shows that they're assholes.
Microsoft rushing an unfinished product to market, when have I heard that before? Seriously though, if this is true then people just shouldn't support these buffoons anymore.
I stopped reading as soon as they claimed that Kojima is developing the game.
Actually, Halo had no competition when it first came out. Also, this idea you have that none of the PS3 exclusives have lasting power is called an opinion, so stop passing it off as fact. Oh, and learn how to spell.
X_GAMER_X After putting 180 hours into Killzone, I played:
1) inFamous
2) Flower
3) Uncharted 2
4) God of War Collection
5) Heavy Rain
6) GOW 3
7) Demon's Souls
Those are just exclusives, I've played plenty more multiplats. And yes, some games are really enjoyable and can eat up your time (K2 180 hours, Demon's Souls 100 hours). I just get mad when sales and online figures are brought in to determine how good a game ...
We've been busy playing on the 1st party games that have come out since the release of K2. Add 3rd party to that, and yeah, most of us don't spend three years playing the same game (which is kinda pathetic when you think about it).
I'm not a fan of the series (for a lot of the reasons mentioned in the article), but I don't think changing the publisher would've changed that much. The only upside to being with Sony that I can see is that they tend to give their developers as much time as they need to make a game. This might lead to a better experience overall, but it seems like most people are into Halo for the multiplayer, both competitive and co-op. Also, Bungie has a strong relationship with both Naughty Do...
Can people stop approving these translated articles? Not only does the translation almost always suck, but the articles themselves are usually created with the intent of starting stupid arguments on sites like N4G.
Can't be that hard, just release a game full of bugs for cheaters to exploit. Make it more noob friendly by continuing to add insanely overpowered perks and killstreaks and also find a way to make the game even more appealing to campers than it already is. Basically, just ignore common sense and solid game design principles and the CoD name will live on.
Yes, men like a game in which a green guy shoots purple guys with pink things. Sounds legit.
And men love Battlefield.
Very interested in this game. I saw a trailer on Joystiq that pretty much has me convinced that I will be buying this. Now we just need a solid release date and price.
Halo will sell more in NA, GT5 will sell more everywhere else. Also, who cares? I'll be more than happy with my purchase (GT5) regardless of how much Halo or CoD sell.
You can't play sales.
Fingers crossed for another gothic RPG from From Software.