Ask yourself in everything you do...Is it actually true?

gamey

Member
CRank: 5Score: 15440

HAHAHAHAHA...HAhahaha.Haha. Ron Perlman just made the cast of any movie; any game. Well played, Perlman. Well muthafuxxxin played.

3937d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's a very nice statement. Thanks for contributing, kalkano.

3937d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Way to use the words, big guy! As always, I'm here to PM if you actually give a shee*t.

3937d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

At least we should acknowledge through our modern lens that these things are bad. They are relevant because they still exist in our society (though most empathetic people don't subscribe to them) and they are worth discussing. Witcher 3 still rocks and I love it, I have a slightly different opinion (a good one) and don't downvote me, bro.

3937d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

I am so tired of looting everything I see. I can't wait to loot everything I see!

3937d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Dude. You have to use the dong as a rudder. It's there you just can't see it. Hit xxx on xbone. Prob same on PC.

3941d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Because Barbies don't have full-frontal sex scenes. I hate to crap on your analogy but you missed the concept of "context". So...*crap*.

3941d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Dude, get over it. It's funny. And your comparison sucks balls because in most games there aren't balls to suck but in this one there should be (balls to suck). And Kotaku is called Kotaku. Don't be immature.

3941d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Dude. It won't do it for me, but for the sake of people like me (who like ladies' parts) but with a different predilection (dong parts) dongs should be just as full-frontal as bush. It's just the way it should be. There is literally no argument against full-frontal dong that makes any moral sense given a climate of full-frontal bush (yay).

3941d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

This crazy artice was complete clickbait. It was poorly written, full of conjecture and weird vitriol and I sure hope the writer never thinks about going to law school! Or maybe they really need to, I'm not sure. It's getting a pass because some people think kotaku and polygon are EVIL gaming sites, so...great article!

3945d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I probably visit about 10-12 gaming sites regularly including Kotaku and Polygon. It's not even close to sad, it's great! There's no big bad guy here. It's made up. Some people just seem to need an enemy and they'll make one up if they don't have one. As to your second point, I just don't know how you would begin to think that. Those sites exist around games and the people who read them are gamers. No conspiracy, it's actually pretty simple.

3945d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

That's a very reality-based thought process you have there. I'm not sure it fits the narrative though. Here's an example "Whaaaa...both corrupt sites had SIMILAR articles....I'm so shocked /s Why are these sites still around, it's a shame GG wasn't turned into something it wasn't so they had enough backing to hurt these guys hard.".-Foxtrot. Now THAT'S the kind of hard-hitting incisive comment that generates the applause around these here parts.

3945d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Tell me more. I'm sooooo interested in what you have to say.

3961d ago 12 agree4 disagreeView comment

Fair point. I'll have to get my hands on it to really test the similarities, but I suspect you're right. You know, in a way they are both sort of fantasy genre, RDR just happens to be sort of based on U.S. history. I take it back; this is a bad theory, hehe.

3961d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

God, it looks great. Anyone but me feel like this game is the spiritual successor to Red Dead Redemption? Not just the horse, but the music, camera, environment interplay "feels" very similar.

3961d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

Your comment hits the nail on the head. Especially your first 2 statements. Anyone who questioned why this is being written about (as if that was such an imposition, the horror!) needs to really reflect on your first statements. It's heartening to see something rational instead of the knee-jerk "straight males are being persecuted!" MRA diatribes echoed around here.

3984d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Man, it's cool to see that Raiden is more progressive than a lot of the commentators here. I would have lost respect if he went red-in-the face and yelled some diatribe equivalent to "icky" or "SJW blah blah".

3985d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Here's how it works: lgbt narratives have been well under-represented until relatively recently, and now that the majority of people realize and accept that awareness and tolerance aren't bad things, more narratives include lgbt characters. It's not merely a trend, it's a social shift towards being aware of who makes up our society rather than denying it or automatically freaking out about it.

3985d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

I don't understand your comment. It sounds like you're excited and that would make sense if your were a psychopath.

3985d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

What's an "SJW"? I'm kidding. You really need to get over your weird obsession with maligning and crapping on heightened social awareness and equal treatment. That's what you're doing by the way. And that's ALL you're contributing by making comments like these. You know who's actually freaking out about this article? Here's a huge hint: Bigots.

3985d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment