FyBy

It doesnt matter. Ps5 uses oodle + Kraken compression for textures. So ps5 still much faster in texture loading.

Stadia should partner with Epic if it wants to survive.

Rumble is not same thing like haptic feedback. For example nintendo joycons have better haptics then xb controller and ds4. Xb has better haptics then ds4. Im curious how good haptics will be in dualsense. But more then haptics Im looking forward for adaptive triggers - thats real deal.

That cant be only about death stranding for pc. Keighley tweets "Very Special Announcement". What is special about Death Stranding on pc now?

And still, its only connected to PCIEx 4.0...

Why do you think that? Stop that nonsense please.

Yeah, your Coffee time will end. Really sad. Much earlier, when all software was on cartridges no one was unhappy, that loading was too Fast. Developers used disadvantage of loading into little advantage. No one forces developers to not make a loading screen even when there is nothing to load LOL. But answer to this is tutorial or tips during play. Or do we have to talk about loading screens were so good?

If PS5 is for 300 USD and games for 70, Im perfectly ok with it.

Game is really good. For 40 bucks its a steal for a new game on the pc platform.

Statement PS5 is masterpiece of systems doesnt mean xsx is not. Im really looking forward for detail hardware analysis of both machines by for example digital foundry.

TF is also important parameter of GPU. But it only says theoretical amount of floating point operations per second. Thats all. It doesnt say anything about how system will perform as a whole. It can be used as a comparative attribute because typically when systems have same architecture (like PC or XO and PS4), it can give you idea how much fps/resolution can machine process. But its only one part of system. So if xsx can produce up to 12tf and ps5 10,28TF, it really doesnt mean too much. May...

I agree with some of your statements. But I think that you misunderstood ps5 philosophy. It doesnt matter where it averages. If I use your analogy,you dont need car running full Gas all the time. You need it when you are trying to get ahead of another car. Then you can slow down. Here it will probably be the same. If you need to calculate complex scene, you can use the power and Cerny said, you can be always almost on top frequencies. And thats the compromise maybe also because of ps5 "f...

This seems like some form of ai assistant in games - small screen with tutorial will adapt to your movement on main screen. Maybe.

I agree. U4 was short but Witcher3 was too long. My ideal for strong story driven game is about 15 hours. But in the end I can imagine paying 60 USD for 15 hours and another 60 USD for another 15 hours, so it can be also DLC. I have no problem with it.

I understand Phils rhetorics, but I still have a feeling, theyre on a damage control wave this whole generation. They are so friendly, everything for gamers, to be happy, everything will be beautiful. Nice. But Phil, simply, give us great games and it will be great. Thats what matters. Otherwise all that Pass-anywhere-cloud thing isnt attractive at all :-(

There will be SIE logo, so this will load instantly and when logo is gone, game is loaded also instantly. Maybe game resume (I read something about context game start directly into saved game) will be under 1 sec...but come on...thats instantly - quickly fading dashboard out and fading game in and you wont recognize difference from instant.

Buy Sony.

Their pain is price. They know it. They dont Want to go high as ps3. They know sweetspot is 400 USD. But, xss will be probably Very cheap. I think Digital only version is good idea. They have much more from Digital sale then 10usd per game as someone posted here. You can resale disc games. But you buy Digital and you cant sell it. Plus they have massive sales on PS store. Its about marketing. I think Digital / disc is planned to be 400/500 but because of xss, there is option to little more ch...