Console gamers were limited by the capability of the last generation consoles, not the technology of televison. And just an FYI SDTV also have 60 hz refresh too.
60 frames is ideal for any games if your system have the capability to run it. It is especially ideal for competitive multiplayer games when winning is determined by anyone who react the fastest and having a many frames is definitely beneficial.
According to the job description, it only for multimedia applications and doesn't really talk about digital games.
https://www.playstationjobs...
Original Xbox hard modded with XBMC dashboard installed. Was years ahead of the media capabilities of any consoles back then.
Considering the sketchy past of previous games, I am highly doubting the integrity of his claim. The PC has been suffering from bad ports and their awful proprietary UPlay game launcher. I still remember their last attempt to impose their alway online DRM BS.
It is universally accepted that the PC version will always be on top when it comes to multplats. If they included that pc can run pass 60 frames and run at 4k resolution then it's absolutely no contest.
You are forgetting that Microsoft is also implementing DX12 on Xbox One and the same API on the PC will the same on Xbox One.
A PS4 and Xbox One is especially a closed system running a mid-end AMD x86-64 APU, so using the same game tools between PC and current consoles makes sense.
@D3athc3ll
You saying PS4 is better than PC because Uncharted 4 is never coming to PC is like saying Xbox One is better than PS4 because Forza is never coming on PS4. The exclusive rights to a game has nothing with the capabilities of a machine. Remember when PS Fanboys said that Last of Us was the best looking game of all time because of the unique Cell architecture of the PS3? Then a year later, Naughty Dog not only managed to successfully port their engine over to the tra...
I dunno, maybe because it doesn't even exist on PC so we can't make really make a comparison.
900p upscaled on a native 1080p monitor looks very different.
Looks like Sony is giving the PS4 Dual band support which is big for those who have routers that supports 5 ghz
It makes sense seeing as the controls for Destiny is almost one-to-one with Halo and Xbox fans have been playing Halo since the original Xbox.
I agree. I am not spending 60 dollars on series of quick time events =P
Sweet I'm totally buying it
Some of the games on the list are demanding because they are poorly optimized ports. COD: Ghosts for example shouldn't take a GTX 670 to run at 1080P at ultra settings when the PS4 can run the same game at the same setting while using a GPU with less than half the power.
I wouldn't get rid of user reviews just because a collective amount of people disagrees with your opinion. The user reviews are useful because major gaming websites will be paid to give a good rating for a game and to opposite extent, the aggregated score from the Critic scores are wrongfully high.
I already that the PC version of Dead Rising 3 was a half-baked port when I read that it was going to be capped at 30 frames, but I didn't know that the game actually ran worst than the Xbox One. They are most defiantly not going to get my money.
That is entirely not true since Valve get a percentage of commission for every digital content sold on Steam and EA gets a bulk of the profits for games sold on their Origin platform.
There are SDTV are also non-interlaced as well or 480p. And besides that, HDTVs were already a standard well before the last generation consoles era ended so your television argument is null to begin with.