fullmetal297

This feature along with DLNA streaming is the only the services that is keeping the PS4 from being better than the Xbox One.

It's plain and simple: Consoles can handle the game in 60 FPS. And judging by the system requirements, you need a pretty beefy PC rig to enjoy this game a decent framerate. Looks like the Witcher 3 is shaping to be the next Crysis in system benchmarks.

That been said, I particularly don't mind playing playing the Witcher 3 in 30 frames since playing the Witcher 2 in 30 frames with my GTX 670 had no effect on my overall experience.

Ouch, I was excepting a B average after hearing about the short campaign but below C threw me off guard. I gotta see the user reviews and more critic reviews.

It depends on the experience you are getting and overall replay value. If the rumors are true and I am getting only 6 hours of gameplay with no multiplayer, then I am expecting the campaign to keep me on my feet from beginning to end.

Nathan Drake is attractive because he is the figure of what every man wants to be and what every woman desires: strong and athletic, displays confidence, and displays a sense of humor. Who wouldn't want those qualities?

Hopefully DX12 will alleviate the half baked ports for the PC. I am tired of seeing games being sold full retail price but struggles to run pass 60 frames and/or have no thought in the keyboard layout so game controls are arkward.

1.) GamingBolt
2.) Nope
3.) Looks at URL. Sees N4G
4.) Oh yeah...

I'm rooting for a jet fighting simulator game. Real life jet fighters rely on a helmet that displays information on their helmet screens so thee halo lens would be close to real life experience.

I don't think that lack of 3D support isn't detrimental to the PS4 since the most HDTV companies has dropped 3D support and 3D media is all but gone. I do however agree with is the DLNA support which doesn't make any sense to not include. Just about every device has some kind of DLNA support (phones, TVs, media players, etc) and it has become a standard now. If Sony thinks that piracy was a major concern then why would PS3 have DLNA support? There no reason that the PS4 should not...

@OpenGL
There is no software on the PC that could increase the performance over console. Performance is tied directly to speed of flash memory and quality of the memory controller inside the SSD.

You should get the digital version simply because a hard drive loads much faster than a disc. This is especially important for open world games.

Let me get this straight. You think stream AN ENTIRE game which takes much much more bandwidth on your internet connection is better than streaming parts of a game?

Or like why on Earth would you disable DLNA when it takes no effort to make a patch for one? Answer: Because Sony wants to promote their monthly "Unlimited" subscription service by forcing out the competition.

See? Yet another stupid question answered.

I still don't understand how partitioning t
the memory into 3500mb and 500mb sections helps for better traffic management. Someone care to explain?

Then with your logic, Microsoft never faslry advised the Xbox One being an always online DRM console and all that talk was just "Mere Buff". At worse it was just bad representation from Don Mattrick.

Yeah see how this logic doesn't make any sense.

I've never heard of somebody actually charging Early Access to a FREE-TO-PLAY game that is buggy and unplayable mess, and then further add insult to injury by including microtransations that gives players an unfair advantage. Sony, you had a massive step with Planetside 2 but too two GIANT steps backwards with this God awful mess.

Just look at the Steam customers complaining about this game and not one positive review to be seen so far.
4036d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment