Does anyone think the game will be a bit too short? you can beat the original game in less than 10 minutes according to a youtube video.
Normal play through in about 30 mins or less, i personally think they should either make the levels a bit longer and bosses more difficult, or just add more levels.. but since it's a remake i doubt they will stray much from the original.
There needs to be a PC version, period.. As long as it has at least 64+ player or a selectable amount of players, dedicated servers & Steamworks, plus ability to make our own game mode like Cops n Robbers in SA-MP, this game will be awesome.
Best version for multiplayer can easily be on PC if R* don't gimp it again like they did with IV.
Yep, this will be the best version..
All it needs is
Steamworks support, not GFWL cos it sucks.
64+ player online, scriptable/editable game modes, dedicated servers.
I think this can be better than San Andreas online, certainly has the potential as long as R* don't screw us over again like with IV.
San Andreas was awesome, Vice City was very good.. GTA 3, eh.. i just didn't think that much of it.
GTA IV is dull in comparison to GTA V (videos at least)
Has anyone noticed a pattern?.. I mean the first 3D GTA, GTA 3 i found about average at best.. But after playing Vice City then going back to 3, 3 is barely playable and hardly any fun. Then they made an even bigger step with San Andreas.
Then for the first next gen game they went back to the seriousness and most of the dullness of GTA 3.. I never played the addons for it yet but, it seems they are bring...
No obviously not, i am just comparing specs. Look at current AMD 6 core processors, they are about on par or close to the Intel i7 4 cores.
Now PS4 is using much lower clock speeds than you get on PC's even though it has an 8 core CPU, so overall i wouldn't be surprised if the total performance is similar to even the first i7's from 2008.. though i can't guess exactly because i only know a bit about the processor in the PS4.
Probably less tha...
This guy doesn't know much about computers obviously.
Look at AMD's 6 core CPU's, their about on par with a 4 core i7 from Intel.
So even though the PS4 has 8 cores, it's not like its a complete beast. It's sharing GDDR5 memory with the whole system instead of even having dedicated DDR3/DDR4 for the system. Not the best thing to do but it's obviously cheaper to do it.
So yes, PC's are still way better. My 2009 grap...
This game has huge potential especially on the PC.
If R* make GTA V have scriptable game modes like SA-MP and at least 64+ player online while using Steamworks & dedicated servers.. it would be absolutely awesome.
Editable game modes like SA-MP would make this game just great online, I would play it almost non stop and so would tons of other people.
For performance and multiplats, PC..
First party games, Wii U and PS4.
I don't think there's going to be a clear cut winner..
You simply cannot kill the PC, sure there's less people that build/own gaming PC's in favor of tablets or whatever.. but there is nothing like a building a PC yourself, it's not that expensive.. has tons of games and can do way more than any console.
I think the misconception is that the online of games would be empty, simply not true.. many multiplayer games are thriving, even years old ones.
Tablets are not much good for proper games anyway, jus...
The cost of online subscription soon adds up.. add the cost of a console at launch, 2-3 years of xbl or psn and at least 10 games bought new = the price of a decent gaming PC. You can build one for about £600 minimum.
For 1080P, you'd be able to run games practically 60+fps on almost all of them as long as you have a mid-high end gfx card with that. It's not all about the graphics either, usually guaranteed better frame rates.
Plus of course, the...
Do you always have to put a wink at the end of your posts? it's like this guy is a major troll trying to start flame wars.
Carl Zeiss.. Ever since i heard about the lenses on camcorders i always thought that name would suit a drink more.
Sounds like Carl's Ice.
Wii U offers unique games, if you really want to go all out you'd spend extra and build a gaming PC. Which will only work out a similar cost when you buy PS4 at launch with the cost of online subscription and high priced games.
When i upgrade my computer i'll be getting some DDR4 ram for the system and by that time a GPU with GDDR5 ram which will be much faster than even PS4, my current 5870 GPU is already practically PS4 territory and i've had that since 2009.
I think PS4 is sharing all that GDDR5 ram between the whole system instead of having dedicated DDR3?. It would've been better to have dedicated ram for both GPU and system, but i guess its cheaper that way to share it.
AMD make good graphics cards but are a bit behind when it comes to processors, this is why i shifted straight to i7 as soon as it released in late 2008. For gaming, newer processors aren't much faster in frame rates if you check any recent benchmarks, the main benefit is that they can overclock more.
Even if you pair an original i7 with a fast graphics card you still get pretty much top notch fps, newer processors are about 30% or so faster at best. i7 920 is a beast to l...
I somewhat agree, it's a good game but it's definitely not as fun to play as San Andreas.
The more realism they add to this seems to make it boring, i mean GTA 3 i thought was dull and too serious, Vice City was much better and San Andreas got it right. Then it went dull again going to GTA 4.
Maybe 6 months later, who knows. That's the one i'm waiting for, hopefully they don't screw up the multiplayer potential this time because 4's was bad and boring.
I want to have tons of players in a server.. maybe 64 at least, i mean we have 150-200+ in SA-MP which is awesome fun.. i think we can have 64+ no problem on the PC version, i just hope there are editable/scriptable game modes and complete freedom this time and not like 4 where its really restricted,...
Get out more for what?, if you haven't noticed there are plenty of assholes around outside who like causing trouble for no reason.
Far safer inside, though it doesn't hurt to go out sometimes.
The console is pretty powerful, you can see quite a difference from 3DS games. Like Rayman Origins, looks quite a lot better on Vita.
Vita is practically a handheld PS3, it has SOME great games, it just needs more.
Not to mention the browser on the Vita is much more useable than 3DS's, plus the bonus of YouTube, more comfortable controls & comfy system shape.
Hardly a laughing stock, i bet you've never played either the Vita or Wi...