CRank: 5Score: 47770

I mean it might run oassivky well but it's not replacing physical hardware fir 80+% of players ever. Unless you literally live next to their servers- the laws of physics mean that latency will always be an issue.

915d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The thing is gta4 was pretty boring and gtav was way more fun. So that's a subjective opinion however on the matter of Nicole and diming their fans yes that is a shame to see but sadly not too surprising these days

916d ago 14 agree6 disagreeView comment

I think you overestimate how much they are worth, considerably. They will cut their studios considerably and when the grim work is done someone will swoop in and buy them at a bargain price just before they collapse completely. They'll get those ip for a bargain.

917d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I mean aony purchasing them would be a solid idea for them, they now own the Tolkien estate and Sony own film studios/film distribution so not only is it a win for them in terms of the ips but also the cross media opportunities which they are big on atm and are fine outsourcing and would probably have no problem continuing to outsource the movies to WB. It also gives them an excellent negotiating position for 3rd party exclusive content on WB games. Plus I'd love to see a high quality LoT...

917d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Isn't working for them because they don't have a larger company backing them. It would work for someone like Microsoft to a point because ultimately money isn't really an issue for them.

917d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

We had 2 spiderman games in like the last decade that were worth playing and you are burned out in spiderman? Wtf. Yeah what a load of bullshit.

918d ago 14 agree2 disagreeView comment

Erm it has issues running on the new consoles lol nevermijdnlast gen.

922d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's stemming from the fact it would make sense based on Sony buying companies they already work closely with and collaborate with. But I think especially based on the job listing Sony had for a mergers and acquisitions manager for playstation to handle "inorganic opportunities for growth" means they are more likely to target companies for IP for exclusives and cross media possibilities.

927d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Then you are delusional they aren't about to resurrect loads of defunct activision ip. The studios making COD will still be making COD because they need them to as they have to make money off this after spending 70 billion dollars their investors will do their nut otherwise.

COD will come to playstation but all other ip's nah, thry will now be xbox exclusive and this move is going to force Sony to make similar moves and buy publishers. So you are cheering on exactl...

927d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

I'm fuckinf pissed off by this I had it ib my bloody cart and didn't get it.

927d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

I don't get it, they are saying they didn't want to redeem their battlepass this season after buying the ultimate edition but I'm sure the wording was "1st premium season free" and "first year of seasons premium battlepass" which generally would mean you choose not to redeem a season or the first season and you miss it .

930d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

But that isnt peoples complaint here. Their complaint is they ate accidentally activating the battlepass that came with the edition of the game they bought. If you buy the battlepass you need to have enough silver and it does ask you to confirm the purchase.

931d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Like what? Why? They are pretty noticeable on the map and you get half an hours notice. How are you not looking at the map in over 30 mins....

931d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

What's deceptive about this? I thought it was pretty clear if you were clicking tinactivate the premium battlepass. I'm also really confused why you WOULDNT want to activate your battlepass ASAP given you won't get the progress on it if you don't activate it.

931d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

If its live service/multiplayer title then resistance is a decent bet the ip would suit such a model quite well I think and has history being a flagship multiplayer title that sony at the time actually did put out to compete with halo and COD and managed to sell well despite the competition. Its coop was second to none in resistance 2 so...

931d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

I don't see them doing anything with that IP again, it's also in a genre Sony don't really need anyone else working on a title in. Nah resistance would make the most sense tbh.

931d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

The smart move here would be android based with their own ps q ps store full of psp and ps vita titles emulated to run on this hardware the hardware wouldn't even need to be that strong, an sd card slot would be required. Then from there you have an emphasis on streaming from ps5 and the ability to patch it with a new app to stream direct from ps plus in the future.

932d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Tried to play the beta. It's shit with mobile controls and I cba linking a controller to my phone...

932d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I see day and date gsmes being moved to the essential tier in the future and/or activision being kept as separate entity and their games added oky to game pass essential like ea play....

937d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

On what planet is it better than sonys plan? You get multiplayer on the lowest proced ps plus tier aswell as the gsmes each month to keep forever as long as you are subscribed- also ps plus edsential is cheaper than games pass core. This is inline with the pricing of ps plus extras price, essential is 3 quid cheaper and premium is cheaper than gsmes pass ultimate by about the same amount.

If your an ultimate aubscriber you are technically losing a feature.....

937d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment