It does need to change... but it isn't boring.
Is FFV good? I usually see people praise 6, 7 and 10 as the best in the series, but 5 barely gets mentioned. Either way, looking foward to playing it.
Living up to the name, I see.
It's f*ckheads like you that make men look like dumbasses.
That's old. It's also stopping girls from playing games.
"We MUST make a profit to become what we want to become"
online pass revenues won't help you in the slightest. EA needs to advertise it well, or it's barely going to do over a million, 2 million at the most. Unless the reviews are good, and I mean REALLY good.
I hope it does well, maybe TESVI will have good combat if it does.
The demo was great. If the full game is 10 hours long and stays that good all the way through, it's going to be fantastic.
What about the ending of R2? The planet and the sky... Earth didn't even look the same. I was disappointed it didn't tell us what that was about. If IT DID... then i'm even more disappointed that it was such a boring explanation.
I was hoping that they moved Earth to their planet. Heck, maybe even turned Earth INTO their planet. But instead they tried to slowly freeze Earth to make it habitual... What about the planet? Even if they explained it, it was disappointi...
What's with the disagree's? Do you think showing U3 around it's release was a good idea? Or do you think KB's commercial was good? Face it, Sony marketed the game poorly. Any disagree's can look at the sale's number.
Many R2 fans didn't buy it because it didn't have 8-player co-op. I was hesitating about pre-ordering it. I'm glad I did, because it's a great game, but Sony's terrible marketing killed it.
If you'...
R2 is probably still my favourite shooter on the PS3, and maybe even on any system. If R3 had the big scale battles and 8-player co-op from R2, it would have done better. It also had Uncharted 3 commercials launching around it's release, so Sony wasn't really helping it.
Kevin Butler's commercial was an epic fail. That didn't help either.
Yeah... and stop any chances of me buying a 720. If you want to get a second 720, you would need to get a second copy of the game. If this is true, then I hope Anonymous hacks Xbox Live.
It releases at the 20th of March, so I think it will do fine. Any closer to RE6 and it would be.
But you have to get up to level 51 (I think) to use it... That took me over 20 hours of good playing to do. If they increase it to 6 shots per kill, it will be balanced.
CODIFIED? What is that supposed to mean?
If it's a seperate mode with 6 main characters, then I will probably be excited. Racoon City looks like trash compared to this, RE6 having 6-player co-op would absolutely crush it.
I'm guessing that was her with a different voice actor. I hope she's good at fighting, cause i'm not helping her again.
Does it get better after the first half-hour? If not, then this is one of the most boring games i've ever played.
High resolution doesn't equal good graphics. It's a very generic looking game whereas MW3 looks worse in MP, but has some good looking setpieces in the SP. The 2008 Prince of Persia still has some of the best graphics this gen IMO. The art style and unique world looked much better than both IMO. Neither BF3 or MW3 could have done this, but BF3 does nothing interesting with the graphics.
It looks and sounds (with headphones) MUCH better than CoD4. As for the SP, short,...
No. I've played the full game, and it's the same as the beta (don't care about the glitches). Prone, bland maps, broken kniving, laggy controls and campers butchered the game. BC2 was superior in every way possible. Art style was better than BF3's graphics too.
MW3 has better shooting, controls, SP, Co-op and far less camping.
Haters in by the dozen. What are they doing here? They should be running across long, bland fields so they can try to kill the camping snipers with their uncontrollable assault rifles in the most balanced game ever; ProneField 3.
15 buttons... that's a little overkill isn't it?