UC2 won GOTY in 09, so yes.
It sucked. Stop trying to say it was good, because it wasn't.
Look up the definition of "sick". If internet nerds make you sick.... you do have some serious problems.
If they make you sick... You have some serious problems.
Halo 4 defeated anything Sony showed combined. So did South Park. MS wins if you ask me. MS didn't have any boring moments either, whereas Sony showed Wonderbook for 20 minutes. AC3 naval gameplay was boring too.
I don't think it looks generic and bland, just nothing special. I don't mind generic, and TLOU could be brilliant, but the E3 demo was average.
Halo 4 convinced me to get a 360... So probably that. Maybe South Park. Maybe Lords of Shadow 2, since I watched the trailer about 20 times now.
You're kidding me right? Ascension looked tired as hell. Same linear combat sections and linear boss battles with QTE's and... that's it. It's now as milked as CoD in terms of gameplay.
They showed some rooms with combat in TLOU... the combat didn't look like anything special either. Limited health and and ammo is great and all, but that's been done plenty of times before. AI looks painfully stupid too.
Terrible.
That was a pile of s***. Quantic Dream's game and Far Cry 3 were the only decent things about it. Where was Sucker Punches new game? GOW:A looked like the same tired crap that 3 and GoS were, and they showed a few rooms in TLOU. No-one cares about Harry Potter school, so why did they use 20 minutes with it? And they showed some boring ship gameplay in AC3.
This was worse than MS's one.
Batman couldn't be decapitated anyway.
The guy that wrote this obviously didn't see the new trailer for MGR:R... It looks like absolute garbage.
None of those studios innovated anything. Unless you count good graphics as innovative.
Winter... which Winter? America's? Japan's? Still, looking foward to this either way.
What a stupid concept art. The chimera is pointing it's gun up, and what does he plan to do with an axe? Die? He doesn't even have it ready to attack.
*spoilers*
There was so much wrong with ME3, and that's not even including the ending. The biggest problm is the fact that TIM is always a villian. Working with him could have added a TON of replayability. You could choose his option at the end anyway, so why the hell wasn't that an option? He was better than the Alliance.
Add the fact that choices didn't matter, Tali's face, the citadel being the only hub apart from the Normandy (until maybe ...
You wouldn't be saying that if Uncharted 2 had UC1 level graphics. And UC2 had no competition in 2009. In Mass Effect 2, you and all 10-12 of your squad members could die.
In UC2, everyone lives. Every time. Elena getting injured by the grenade? Who cares. We all knew she would live. If it was ME2, her dying would be a possibility, making it 10X more intense. And that's what ME2 does best; intensity. Something that UC2, and most other games lack.
Unch...
Mass Effect 2 is easily the best i've played. And i'd put RDR on there, replacing UC2(gah).
ME3 was going to be one of the greatest games ever, but if the extended cut dissapoints, then the entire game did too.
Dedicated severs with custom rounds, clan support and 32 players with big maps. In other words, make it like KZ2. KZ3 sucked due to these lack of features.
KZ2 lasted 2 years in NZ. KZ3 was dead on day 1, and still is. If you wanted to play on anything other than KZ2 maps, then you had to join a dead round. So no day 1 DLC, or community will be split on day 1 again.
is this the same hardcore gaming crowd that is making the Vita a runaway success?