If you read up on the story after you beat it, I would say Dark Souls.
The list is in no particular order. Red Dead gets my vote for best looking game, looking at the world from a mountain and knowing you could explore it beats any linear game (for graphics) IMO. I would also add Prince of Persia 2008 to the list.
Agreed. I'm just saying that it does nothing anyway if the staff have no power over it.
Did those staff have control over the day 1 DLC? If not, harassing them does nothing.
Not really a fair comparison though is it as production costs for PS1, PS2 and PC games from that era were far less than they are now.
Black Ops. MW3 has better co-op though.
Not if you're playing on consoles.
I'll wait for the price of it, along with the memory cards and games, to go down.
ME2 didn't get a complete edition, so I wouldn't keep my hopes up.
F*ck off EA. Put it on the disc you greedy bastards.
...Though I have to admit a Prothean squad member sounds interesting.
The Wraith completely ruined R2 multiplayer for me. If you start shooting them, they turn their sheilds on, wait for their health to regenerate, then shoot. it's the fastest killing weapon, even with the warm-up. You need two people for flanking to easily kill one, but it shouldn't have been that hard.
When there was no-one using it, it was great, but it only took one Wraith to ruin it. I might have got the 10,000 kill trophy if it wasn't for the Wraith and the m...
Killzone 2 was good, 3 had terrible balance. Resistance? 2 had the HVAP Wraith, making all other weapons pointless, and 3 had the insta-kill Atomizer. Battlefield can't be balanced, due to the vehicles. Uncharted has some bad perks, power weapons (T-Bolt snipers, anyone?) and kickbacks.
I'm not saying CoD has perfect balance, but it's at least up there with the one's I just listed.
What does the engine have to do with balance? People say CoD4 had perfect balance, and that uses the same engine. I don't know what you guys are on about, because MW3 is very balanced.
Nah, it's the BF3 one's. They keep saying how much better it is than CoD, yet don't look and see that BF3 is just CoD with slightly bigger maps and clunky controls. Sure, CoD could use a new engine. But it's still good. Besides, the haters are the most annoying people "to have ever hit earth".
I hope one of them hits someone. It would be bad, but I would still laugh to death.
No. Uncharted is a watered down Mass Effect 3. See, I can sound stupid too.
I hated it. the open world made me miss turns and I ended up screwing up the races because of it. Instead of yellow barriers, you get green arrows at the top of the screen, meaning you have to concentrate on that as well as the road and traffic. It was too easy to make a mistake.
"However, the sad truth of the BAFTA GAME Award is that it has became a mass popularity contest, of which, Call of Duty wins each year."
If i'm remembering the same awards, they gave ME2 GOTY last year. MW2 arguably deserved it in 2009, no matter what internet people say. It's a popularity contest, so don't take it seriously.
Don't pretend COO and GOS don't exist, I would say they are better than 3. If GOW4 has the same combat and/or linearness, it's better off dead IMO. If possible, maybe they should make it semi-open world, if that could work. Or even just bigger battles. Imagine seeing hundreds of standard enemies on a huge battleground.
I don't really care that they've released 5 main GoW's, I just don't like that they've been exactly the same gameplay-wise.
It wouldn't exactly be hidden if you could see it...