Micro$oft already has Xbox.com. M$ doesn't need that domain and if they wanted it they should have acquired it years ago. I see no reason someone should have to give up their domain name just because big business wants to bully you around. It is the same concept as when the government goes in and takes someones land, its BS. Just goes to show that noone every owns anything anymore.
my thoughts as well. I have been an xbox supporter for 12 years, but the way the new xbox is set up is just going to far for me. If the PS4 is less restrictive overall, that will be where i game.
Agreed, it has to happen. Keep Snake intact by using Hayter. Ubisoft decided not to use Ironside, so I have no interest in supporting the new Splinter Cell.
I could see that. Platinum games is probably nearing completion on the Awesome 101. They have Bayonetta 2 in the works, the Rising team is probably still in tact, since they just released more DLC, so it would be easier and probably cheaper to do it now versus waiting a year or two.
Geoff, shut up. I hope I don't have to see this guy prancing around the event everywhere in videos.
MS biggest mistake is aligning itself to live TV. Live TV is a retracting and some would say a dying business. Noone is interested in TV commercials except during the Superbowl because they are part of the event. It is all about streaming or buying season sets of shows. PS4 can do that it didn't need to be marketed as a big deal because it is accepted as part of the hardware like a common feature. MS reveal was like, oh look now we play live TV. It was so silly and off message from ...
Why would it be big deal and great for gamers Easily, if they annouce a 360 mini to attach to the Xbox One so you can play your 360 games on it. That would be just going to the well again in my eyes and really tick fans off even more then just having Backwards Compatibility day one. You know like 360 had at launch. I have a feeling MS wants to make money off Backwards Compatability, which would fall in line with how the Xbox One feels to me, which is less value to gamers, but more money to ...
I guess MS decided to use some of that money they saved on the lack of first party studios and first party games these last two generations. If true, then welcome Microsoft to the gaming industry, its about time, it only took 12 years for you to actually invest substanially in creating games.
If I was to guess on how this new game by Remedy will launch. I would guess they will anounce it and show video then it will show up on the console three years lately, much like Alan Wake did. Remedy are a small studio and their development cycles tend to be slow.
Exactly and the specs represent the fact that Sony is a hardware manufacturer and MS is not. Because Sony manufacturers their own gaming hardware they have better insight by default alone. The PS4 specs are much more impressive then the daily check in TVbox DRM One.
Seeing as how 360 fans have always been waiting for 3 years. E3's of 2010, 2011, and 2012 have been disappointing to put it mildly and seeing how I see no continued first party support for the 360 going forward (wheres the games? PS3 has Last of Us and Two Souls incoming) I do not expect alot from MS.
Yes their maybe a few games to start on the One but MS offerings tamper off as a console matures down to two maybe three a year and that is just not going to cut anymore...
Mika putting in DRM is only beneficial to developers that self-publish, which are few and far between. This is more for publishers to line their pockets with more money. Developers will still close up shop as publisher executives and stock holders buy bigger yachts.
LOL, Peter Moore has two tatoos already. What they going to show MS and EA's exclusive deal tatooed on his manhood.
Morgue there are a couple there I don't see happening.
5. External Darkness 2 exclusive ain't happening as Silicon Knights studio is no more.
15. Half Life 3 exclusive ain't happening and if it is exclusive to anything it will be to Steambox or Steam.
I don't think that stance will last long based on two things. First, many 360 exclusives made their way eventually to PC like Gears and Alan Wake, even Mass Effect made it to PS3. Second, when the sales of Xbox One disappoints, they will bring titles to PC to get more money.
He is right, he shouldn't say anything at all, in fact he should keep his fn mouth shut after saying gamers are backwards if they want backwards compatiblity. You insult me, Don.
I know exactly why it didn't mean much because MS has made it that way. IT will be 15 exclusives over the course of a year from launch, so some will be shown this E3 and some will be shown at E3 next year. Of those 15 some will probably be Kinect titles and Arcade titles. Of the ones that are actual core AAA titles, how many will end up on PC or PS4 down the road like Mass Effect, Bioshock, and Alan Wake did? Gamers have had many years to see how MS works and handles their so-called e...
or that MS exclusive will go to PC. MS and the word exclusives mean nothing.
Oh the irony. MS already killed themselves with their reveal, now they will try to kill Sony,lol. There is not one game they could show that will surprise the world and not one that will make me buy their console filled with DRM. DRM will be the end of consoles, it takes away the major advantage they had over PC's. So, expect a major retraction or market crash next gen, if thats the route their going. IMHO.
Is Xbone.com available thats the one I want, so I can start up an online porn store and piss M$ off.