but it's plausible. but it makes more sense that they did have solid snake in mind, as mg2: solid snake and then there's the solid saga. which includes mg3: snake eater, since the remains of big boss is the origin of the plot in MGS.
that whole series should be referred to as the solid series. this new one honestly should be called metal gear raiden.
sad too, since kojima missed his chance to start something COMPLETELY new, and not just split the series between the d...
report the article, and any others after this. we don't need the top 3 articles arguing with each other. in fact, let's stop approving these "confirmation" articles. just stop it there.
jeez. fanboys trying to downplay an amazing showing by kojima just because the words xbox and 360 are involved. you guys are lamer than bush 2002.
it's not bribery. it's not kojima bending to konami's will. it's not stealing. it won't be a halfassed effort, when has kojima EVER halfassed anything.
it WILL be made by kojima. it WILL be a game up to kojima's standards. you WILL be jealous of it, since it's most definitely exclusive. it IS a new IP, since it's a departu...
which is why i go along with the idea that this has been in the works for some time now, only kojima didn't want to alert ps3 fans so that they'd still come out in groves to buy mgs4.
it's true, his games are in the oven for years. which is probably what all those rumors for the last couple of years were trying to prove.
so either kojima plans on releasing this for the xbox 720, or it's already being worked on and he's gonna get it ready for late next year, early 201...
snake's sidekick is otacon. i thought true metal gear fans would know that.
raiden's only been around half of metal gear's life. and stop trying to downplay this game. kojima doesn't halfass anything. just grow up already.
you mean the rrod stories YOU guys keep approving? well if you dont want to see them again just stop approving them, sounds fair to me!
go kojima!
they should keep something exclusive for either console. and to those who are downplaying this, please just grow up. kojima doesn't halfass anything.
i was kinda expecting that the "s" would dropped in favor of an "r" for raiden. metal gear solid rising sounds nice, but they should just go ahead and make this its own series, apart from the mgs series.
And you still don't know what 117 means by now, right?
Come on people. Before this gen we all had ps2's and playstations. We all know who snake is, who raiden is. Stop thinking just because we don't own a Sony console that we don't know about certain games.
todos tenemos que trabajar
colbert, i agree that qface is one of the better members here. but if he or you want to believe that ps3 AS WE KNOW IT would've been built regardless of microsoft's intent with xbox 360 you're kidding yourselves.
for instance, wi-fi. who had that? WHO HAD THAT? NOBODY! so why would sony put it into their console? why would sony not only put that but also bluetooth AND a gigabit ethernet if NO other console had or intended on having such options? also, why would they have even bot...
this ISN'T ABOUT THE CELLBE!!!! IT'S ABOUT THE PS3!!!!
the question isn't whether or not they still would've built CELLBE!!!!! it's whether or not they would've built the PS3!!!!!!
we both AGREE that cellbe was in development for a while, but would they have still felt the need to USE it in the ps3 if x360 wasn't launched? GOING ON HOW WELL PS2 SUCCEEDED, without a doubt the answer would be NO!
edit at above:
thank god dem0n get's it. i have...
instead of bsing your way through this you COULD just admit that you don't want to give microsoft credit. that's much easier than to make me believe sony would've treated us all to HD gaming out of fear that the Wii was going to be a beast of a machine. it was x360 that did it. they even said it themselves that they'd be watching the launch and would delay the ps3 if needed.
you guys are ridiculous!
you honestly believe sony would've developed ps3 if there was no nee...
you mean to tell me that the wii ACTUALLY would've forced Sony to go spend billions on a new processor and disc format and make promises of HD 4D and all that?
right.
edit at below:
yeah but where else was it going to go? in a console! okay, but if x360 woulda never been in development why would they make such a huge leap in technology? they could've easily done EXACTLY what nintendo did: release hardware with only slightly more power and just throw in s...
does it have to be about buying their way up? i mean you can't just admit that they've done well this gen? if not for microsoft's success with xbox 360 you'd all be playing FIRST gen ps3 titles right now, since Sony would've held back ps3's launch until they milked PS2 dry.
anyway, back on topic. i think psp and ds have it pretty much nailed. they have both ends covered, something flashy and something fun, and vice versa. a microsoft handheld wouldn't be advisable. stick with the...
i can't follow the "for money" logic, since you're basically admitting that microsoft is doing well. i mean why else would they have money?
also, it's the only reason that you fanboys seem to muster for ANY company developing or porting over a game to another console. so microsoft has money and is buying games? it just doesn't make any sense.
microsoft makes revenues from its software and hardware, but they are SEPARATE. to say that microsoft takes the mone...
skyfire is good since it loads flash, and i like to visit kongregate a lot and play some kongai (hails yeah). but i prefer opera mini since it leaves out the flash. if i'm going to view flash i'll use opera mobile. if i need fast page viewing and better scrolling, i'll use opera mini. but skyfire's good too.
edit @ arnon
that's why i like opera too, it can keep partial downloads in the event of a crash. it also has a torrent client builtin, and several themes that lo...
I'm sure Kojima's set to wow the world once again, he's never failed to rise up to his calling. I think one day he's gonna have to make good on his plan to retire for a while though, the man has a family ya know. And like any good soldier he's earned his time off.
i don't know where the crappy stigma came from, but you DO know that ie 7 and 8 use what's called protected mode to keep malware and viruses quarantined in a virtualized folder, right? it's actually the most secure browser out there, so of course you're letting go of some javascript performance as it loads pages. but i'd rather have a secure browsing session than not.
opera is actually the best. firefox is buggy, and google chrome is good but not great.
ie 8 is pretty good too, and so is the new ie mobile that ships with window mobile 6.5, but opera wins them all. mobile, desktop, they even have an opera mini that accelerates pages on your mobile phone.
edit:
i don't know where the crappy stigma came from, but you DO know that ie 7 and 8 use what's called protected mode to keep malware and viruses quarantined to a vir...
i see how it can be confused. thanks for clearing that up!