This is such a stupid argument. The idiot who wrote the article should have focused in on what he did and didn't like that was presented at e3 at best Sony should have been a small addendum at the very end. Oh and you can definitely lose by showing up and putting on a mediocre to bad presentation devoid of anything new or compelling to show your fans and damaging your brand. See Microsoft
That was pretty underwhelming
I agree, that gameplay was bland, that star wars IP needs a new developer creating games for it.
I have never believed there is this massive untapped market that needs to play games anytime anywhere. There is only so much time in the day and people have only so much of it to play videogames, and I'm only talking about the market as it currently exists. Google is attempting to enter into a market that is already well saturated with competitors who produce their own content. I dont see stadia lasting very long.
Doesn't look good to me at all. Looks kinda bland to be honest.
Nothing is free even those claiming to be under a no cap regime may be subject to change if their ISP finds there usage rate is spiking due to services like this. It's an expense on top of an expense. I dont think stadia is viable right now and may be quickly abandoned by Google like they've done in the past.
No kojima wanted to have his own studio which he does. He has now entered into an agreement with his favorite platform holder Sony to produce a game for them. Sony is paying for the game so they own the ip, Kojima remains independent like insomniac games.
Can't wait, most anticipated upcoming game .
This may be an unpopular opinion but it's Sony's right to decide what type of games they want associated with their platform. You don't have to like it but it is what it is.
I don't care I'll be there day 1
Not the same, the ps3 was more expensive and Sony still took a humongous loss on every unit sold. That's why it hurt Sony so much.
Tell me about it hahahaha
Notice how the article side steps the fact that Sony right now has a,functioning game streaming service, so how are they not intrested in it as apart of their future. These articles are a practice in deception.
Hand helds are not consoles
Does Forbes simply function as a mouthpiece for Microsoft?
If I get the same great games/vr games as I did from Sony this generation then sign me up for more "arogant" Sony lol. It is Microsoft, who thought they could coast an entire generation without a stable first party output, that showed themselves to be arrogant.
What a stupid article. If the author of article is reading this comment section, be better by being less fanboyish and more neutral in your analysis. It will make your article more objective and less dishonest in service of trying to make the xbox look better.
I predict the variety of games in terms of length and quality will in the foreseeable future be very much like they are today.
Or maybe Richard and everyone else can wait for an official reveal, or a leak directly from a developer with a kit in their hands. I just knew people couldn't just be happy we got some official words about the ps5 without running back to pointless speculating.
Nope, the general response to Microsoft press confrences has been a shoulder shrug. While some of their biggest fans have expressed disappointment as Microsoft again has failed to live up to the hype.