Only because the Move wasn't anywhere near the success with the casuals that Kinect and Wii were. :P
Next gen began for me on november of last year, regardless of what your opinion of what constitutes a "next gen" console is.
And in the end, it will come down to the games. If Nintendo puts out some killer games this holiday season when the OTHER next gen consoles come out, then Wii U will do just fine.
I couldn't, for the life of me, figure out the appeal of this game when it was shown at Sony's conference a few days ago. I know it's made by Jonathan Blow, I know he made Braid (which I have played), but I don't know why I should be excited about this game. What was shown looked incredibly boring to me.
Can someone explain to me what this is about, what I'm missing there? :/
Inventory management on the gamepad alone would make the Wii U version a joy to play.
Lol, loved the ending.
What do you mean by "bigger"?
:)
I won't bother writing a long diatribe to argument against your post, but only wanted to point out that Sony actually has a HUGE list of exclusive games. On this generation, it was Sony who pushed out the most exclusive games for their console, even more than Nintendo, believe it or not.
If you think PS4 games will give PS4-to-Vita support anywhere near the levels that Wii U games support the gamepad, you're sadly mistaken.
It's not a matter of whether the Vita is capable of doing the same thing the Gamepad does or not. It's just that the attach rate will be incredibly low, vs. the Wii U's attach rate to the Gamepad (100%).
Because of this, game developers won't make games with the Vita in mind. If they put Vita-to-PS4 con...
Implying Monster Hunter, Zelda and Pokémon aren't hardcore games. Lol.
XD
Nope, the Wii U game that was used for the comparison is in its early alpha stage (early development), and we don't even know if it was actually running on Wii U hardware.
It's a pretty silly comparison, actually.
I think he meant at launch. The PS3's online today is a beast, but it was VERY different back in its first year. Back then, it sucked balls compared to Live on the 360.
Nope, second maybe. Trine 2 looks far better on Wii U and has extra content that could not have been in the other HD consoles without a serious graphical downgrade according to the developers.
And it's been available on Wii U since launch.
Nope, they're actually first party.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
"In the video game industry, a first-party developer is part of a company which manufactures a video game console and develops exclusively for it. First-party developers may use the name of the company itself (such as Nintendo), have a specific division name (such as Sony's Polyphon...
One observation: Nintendo owns Monolith Soft now, so their game is first party. ;)
I agree with you on almost all counts, except the eShop one. It's not hard to navigate, the problem with is is that... well... it's still pretty much what it was at launch, 3 months ago, with barely any new games for it (only The Cave comes to mind atm).
That, and it's too... meh. It lacks personality. The 3DS eShop is much more appealing, with plenty of demos, videos, nice sections, a "new arrivals" tab that allows you to see the new content week after ...
...and, most importantly, several well placed games. ;)
You really have no idea of the ridiculous amount of game studios that Nintendo owns, do you? They're easily one of the biggest game publishers out there, if not the biggest.
Your argument isn't grounded in reality at all.
Outselling the other 2 next gen consoles: possible.
Being more powerful than the other 2 consoles: no chance in hell.
Post that says "I doubt it" > 32 agrees, 7 disagrees.
Well elaborated, well thought reply with absolutely zero fanboyish nonsense behind it, grounded on common sense and optimism > 2 agrees, 10 disagrees. Sigh.
People must really hate to read. Bubble up for intelligent comment.
6 PS3's? Why so many?
Don't tell me ALL of them broke on you. I'm on my second PS3 and that was bad enough for me. ;_;