Yup even your argument is a good one, but I really feel that like every gen people expect games to look better with every year. Maxing out a console in the very first year isn't always a good thing... The reason I feel is the fact that PC gaming will always be better (graphically) compared to console counterparts. So if a console game maxing it out comes and lets say Crysis 4 comes out blowing the game out of the water, then people will really feel ripped off to some degree.... Not saying PS3...
Hey Dchal 10 bucks says the PS4 will also use Cell technology.. Apart from the fact that it costs less (for the then PS4), it has proven that it can create something that the usual PC architecture of the 360 can't. The main plus point of the 360 architecture is actually the biggest down point.... The easy architecture means the devs max out the console pretty early in it's lifecycle... Just look at the 360 and how the all OMGZ started with Gears 1... After that it's a big dud since you raise ...
Trusting Edge for reviews is like taking Yatchee's advice (the zero punctuation guy) as a real advice. 5 for Dragon Age SERIOUSLY!!!! And I wouldn't even mind it if there was some consistency... Just take this times score for example... AC2 8!!!! The game is absolutely superb!!!!! It packs in a good 20 hours, good graphics, good story and really satisfying combat, I can even say it's the best open world game this year and you give it 8!!!!
And then the usual 9 for a so called 36...
A little mod of HL which was later called 'Counter Strike' introduced millions of players to online gaming. Not saying it was the first (don't know if it was also), but it still is regarded as one of the best multi-player games ever created.... I never discredited Halo, but saying it's 'innovated' FPS on console is BS... Goldeneye did it and Halo made it better by actually making people enjoy FPSes by not making the controls cumbersome... Do you really think Halo would be as popular as it is ...
Actually IMO this is the best fall line up in 3 years if you ask me (At least for the PS3)...
Uncharted 2 was fkin awesome. no matter what this guy says, it's one of the best games I have experienced in a long time and I still play online and get into games.. In the end that is all I care.
Assassin's Creed 2 is also a great game. I had low hopes going into this after the disastrous AC1, but the devs have really listened to the community complains about 1.
Hey YLOD, the game looks amazing but KZ2 still is the king in console FPS graphics mainly due to the number of things the engine can handle on screen... Play KZ2 with 32 player online to know what I mean... And the amount of detailing and polish is just too much.. BC2 is still in it's beta, so improvements can be made, but comparing it to KZ2 in the graphics department is a little unjust on BC2.
Just to give you a few examples, look at the gun model in BC2 and compare it to KZ2 g...
Lol seriously!!! There were better FPSes before Halo you do know that don't you (Hint *it also starts with a H*)? OH wait ah a console gamer only well ok carry on....
LOL M$ Flagship title is still living in the Sub-HD era LMFAO and PS3's flagship title is in Full HD and support 3D... Bububu PS3 playing catch!!!! FU loser Play Beyond the realms of Sub-HD gaming get a PS3, maybe then you will know the true meaning of what HD gaming is...
Lol when he wrote about the headline part, the first name that popped in my head was HHG!!! Debates are good, but when one takes them personally, then there in lies the problem. But sometimes there are the delusional kind of fanboys who one seriously can't reason with.... Sadly that is a part and parcel of every gen. I also admit that without fanboys it won't be fun, but some people just gotta chill.
Infamous excluded from GOTY!!!
Just imagine if those 200 million would have been put to create a new engine and build a longer single player campaign... 40-50 million to produce and rest for ads and disc sigh.... You know that the industry is in trouble when the marketing cost is nearly 3-4 times the production value...
PS3 consistently beating all consoles is a good sign.. Beating Wii by 10K is really good news even after Wii got a price cut... 360 well, it's giving a real fight to the PS2...
Works for me... Call me lucky, but none of the firmware have ever affected my PS3 in a bad way. Uncharted 1 worked after 3.0 even when the community cried of it hanging, trophies sync now, never has it YLODed me after an update (touches wood)... Lucky I guess, but hey going strong here...
OH FOR THE LOVE OF GOD STOP THIS CRAP!!!!!!! Why is it so hard for people to accept the fact that both are identical!!! Got the game on my PS3 and am happy with the way it looks.. And if you feel the other version is better looking, then try adjusting the fking TV for once or switch on RGB....
Lol yeah this and AC2 comparisons are really getting over the top. There is hardly even 1-2% difference between both yet pixel counting never stops lol. But it's a good thing that multi-plats on PS3 are running as good as 360 counterparts..
Got AC2 today and compared with my friends 360 version.. Couldn't spot much difference apart from a little better night time lighting on PS3, but it had screen tearing. It's only at N4G where a crack in some pot kept in a corner gets so much ...
Even HHG has his loyal fanbase (cough multiple accounts) who bubble him up and approve his articles before it gets failed... That is how N4G works mate.. Getting hits is just a headline and few multiple accounts away.
LMFAO.. HHG doing it's own publicity even in a thread where he is proven wrong lol. Again goes to show that this guy throws sh!t at walls and sometimes something sticks and he proudly takes that as an example and leave the rest... Full of fail HHG.. Can't wait to see what your next Headline will be.... You are the first guy I met that first thinks about the headlines and then makes an article/video accordingly.... Worst case of journalism.
Lol funny read... People should just give up and admit that Ubisoft for once got it right and made both versions as close as possible. So stop the pixel counting and move along.
I am picking the PS3 version mainly cause of PSP compatibility. Either ways, if you buy any version, you will be happy with it. But looking at these screen shots, I am happy that the PS3 version is a tad bit better in lighting and textures.... However Frame tear is a little bit more on the PS3, but you gain some you lose some...
BTW I would take LOT comparison with a pinch of salt. They seem to be more 360 PRO off late. I would much rather wait for Digital Foundry, but from most sit...
It's not iTunes, but a rivaling service like iTunes... There is a huge difference mate.... It's like saying you got an iPod and other guy saying he got a mp3 player like iPod... If it were iTunes, this would have been a huge MEGATON, but still pleased that Sony is taking steps in the right direction... Next up I can predict an App store like the one Apple has or like PS3 miniS...