Never said it hurt me, I said it could hurt the game. Only 18% of the US identifies as feminist, and that's largely because modern day feminism is little more than an anti-man hate movement that espouses BS "privilege theory" and tries to claim that women are being oppressed by every man despite having the exact same legal rights men do, and, in some cases, even *more* rights than men do. And even if you don't agree with that interpretation, just claiming something is a &quo...
Jesus Christ, can *anything* escape this BS politicization? You do understand that calling something a feminist game carries a *lot* of negative connotations, right? And it will turn people off who, otherwise, would have no problem with it? Although, this is The Guardian. I shouldn't expect common sense or restraint from them.
Shut up. No one cares. Stop virtue signaling and go back to making games.
How about after PETA stops kidnapping animals off people's porches and murdering them in their kill shelters?
God, I know, right? He's keeping all his campaign promises and doing his best to fix the absolute mess Obama made of the country. What a monster.
Literally the exact same thing Nintendo said to justify the Wii not supporting HDMI, and look how well that turned out.
Lots of people have 4K tvs. And as time goes on, they'll eventually become the norm, especially when cable starts broadcasting 4K channels.
At least they're not proprietary like the Vita cards. Still a really shitty thing to do though. Nintendo gets worse every year.
Good news about Phantom Dust, but I really hope they're not going to rush it out the door because of what happened with Scalebound. At this point, a bad game would be worse for Xbox than not having anything to release before E3 besides Halo Wars 2.
Every time I see Kazuma, I'm the hardest man.
Lol all the people in the comments whining about consoles causing the cuts. Not only did they give very good reasons for why they cut the content, have you losers ever played an inExile game? You could run them on a tablet. They're not intensive at all. Nothing needs to be cut to "fit" on a console. But I guess critical thinking is too much to hope for from a group of people who take pride in being close minded and elitist.
Eh, Square hasn't been impressing me lately outside of FFXV and I'm pretty sick of Marvel right now. Plus, if Square is announcing it today, that means it'll be at least two years before we see anything. At best. Not very excited.
Here's hoping the open world isn't barren and pointless.
THE HORROR!!!
It's such a good thing we live in a world where every important problem is already solved, because otherwise getting upset about stuff like this would just be silly.
Waitwaitwait, why the hell are For Honor and Nier and Nioh and Horizon on this list? For Honor, Nier and Nioh are action games and Horizon is a third person open world adventure game. None of them are RPG's. At all. JFC.
Agreed.
Good, then I definitely get to skip this one.
And they want to get it out before the Scorpio comes out and people have to choose between them.
Gay romance, not same sex. Every ME game let you romance girls with FemShep. Honestly, gay romance should have been there from the beginning, but they totally went back on what they said once about not including it because "Shepard isn't gay".
Eh, his negative points are mostly subjective, as far as I can tell. A Nemesis-like enemy gets too repetitive? That's a good thing, IMO. An enemy that stalks you doesn't need a unique encounter every time. The story gets bad towards the end? I've seen that complaint so many times and most of the time I disagree. The only legit complaint he has is the enemy AI, but even that can be explained by a few bad encounters or some scripting problem that could get fixed with a Day One patch...
Yeah, but they've already confirmed no Conquest mode, so no buy for me.