Its not a glitch, its a ghost. Can't you read?
Lol
I mean, there's nothing wrong with putting out Wii U ports or remasters. In fact, they should considering Wii U did so poorly and not a lot of people got experience those games. But, they should not be charging these ridiculous full prices for them. Thats the real crime.
This sounds extremely familiar. Weren't they saying this same exact thing at the beginning of last gen? Weren't they talking about how Crackdown 3 would do things we've never seen before due to cloud gaming? Didn't Crackdown 3 end up being a piece of garbage? Didn't cloud gaming make absolutely zero difference last gen?
Right. I'll believe this when they can prove it.
There's obviously nothing wrong with charging full price for a new game when it launches. Obviously lol. There's also nothing wrong with people buying them at launch. If they want it that bad and want to pay fill price, no big deal. But who the hell wants to pay full price for a game thats been out for years? Its just silly. And this is even worse. A remaster of a decade
old game warrants the same price tag as a brand nee entry in the series? Thats just laughable.
...
Wow. So a decade old game thats already finished and is just having some remaster work done warrants a $60 pricetag? Are you insane? We're talking about a game that already earned Nintendo millions of dollars. In what world is it okay to charge the same as a brand new game that went through full development for a decade old game being remastered.
Yes, game development had gotten more expensive since the Xbox 360 came out, when we last saw a price hike for games. I get a...
So you clearly don't know what you're talking about, yet you are going to accuse them of being a scam company without even taking a minute to look them up? If you did you would see they are a totally legit company.
@Mr_Writer85
"I mean you don't have a divine right to play every game made. If the developers want to make their game to appeal to a certain gamer the that's fine to do that"
Please, help me understand how a game like Demons Souls wouldn't appeal to the same people it does today if it just had an easy mode also.
"Easy mode beggars" lol
I always start nee games on Hard. If a particular game is too hard, I change back to Normal.
But none of that matters. Devs can still make hard games. Bu why does it have to be hard and nothing else? From Software can make their games as hard as they are now, but with an easy mode option also. How does that impact you or anyone else? Not even the devs are impacted because they still got to make their vision. Well.....th...
This is true. But why do games HAVE to be hard and thats it? They can easily make Demon Souls just as hard as it is now, but with an easy mode option. How does that negatively effect anyone?
Punctuation is your friend. Don't be afraid of it. Embrace it. Let the punctuation flow through you.
Dude, come on. There's no way CDPR had themselves hacked and their assets sold online.
And the crap they went through, and are still going through, is punishment for that.
Yes, they said it ran well on last gen consoles. Yes, they released a horribly buggy, unfinished game. And they are still paying for those mistakes. They've had a lawsuit filed against them. They had their game removed from PSN. They've had to deal with refunds. And they're working around the clock to try and fix it as best they can.
They're paying like an...
What you just said doesn't make any sense at all.
Think about what you said. If Sony really is producing more consoles than Microsoft on a monthly basis, and they are both selling out, then do the math. It would be impossible for Xbox to outsell Sony because Xbox doesn't even have as much stock to sell.
So the ONLY way they can outsell Sony in a particular region is if Sony didn't send as many units to that region as Microsoft. Because again, ...
Fallen Order was also great. But I'm also 100% convinced Disney told EA that if another Star Wars game got as much backlash as Battlefront 2 then they would murder them all.
I think the proof for that is the fact that, despite having a fantastic single player campaign, Squadrons is mostly an online multiplayer game. The exact kind of game that EA would have normally loaded up with microtransactions. Yet they didn't.
How so? They got the same actress, used their photos, had the actress ask for the same exact clothes she wore from the other shoot, hired the same makeup artist, and had them do her hair exactly the same.
How is that not going out of their way to steal that other character's likeness?
I was hoping this update would unlock PS5's in stores. Its starting to get a little silly now.
Why wouldn't you? Because you hate EA? Look, this game is a remaster with some updated gameplay enhancements. Thats it. Its basically the same games but look prettier with better gameplay. And all the DLC comes with it. And outside of multiplayer, which isn't a part of this remaster, microtransactions were never a thing in ME games, that I remember.
I get hating EA. I do too. But they are capable of making good games. Star Wars Fallen Order and Squadrons were bot...
I have absolutely no hope for the next Battlefield game. Which is a shame, as Battlefield was always the superior online shooter, in my opinion. At least until BF1 and BF5, anyway.
I just need them to say PS5's are about to become way more readily available in the next month or so and I'll be happy.