It really doesn't need a reboot when the HD remake is great already. PDZ wasn't even that bad.
Perhaps your black ops team was responsible for:
*SPOILER FOR THOSE WHO HAVEN'T PLAYED COD4*
Finding out Zachaev was making that weapons deal in Chernobyl
*END SPOILER*
"Can anybody name an adventure game better than Fable?"
Bit of an unfair question since quality's subjective.
Same with PS3, Wii, and maybe PC (<don't hold me to the last one).
These games have been released for years now. Shouldn't these so called "gamers" focus on the quality of what the product is rather than what was promised YEARS AGO?!?! Yes, Moly hypes his products immensely, but I've never seen such a huge focus on Fable hype rather than the games themselves.
"If old Peter finally delivers on 8 years of Fable promises, then we welcome good reviews."
So disregard quality and give good revie...
I'm sure Halo 1+2 will become HD remakes eventually.
Figured Motion+ had more than that. Thx for info...
...or a s***load of older Star Wars games.
All you had to do was agree with my report (which I'll take down once the review has improved) instead of making some immature comment. Learn how to post.
MadWorld, Bayonetta, and now Vanquish. All of those titles are met with critical acclaim (to varying degrees) yet can't quite get the bigger sales you'd expect. Sooner or later they'll get those millions of sales they seem to have deserved about a year ago.
Who knows, maybe Vanquish will do really well in US and EU
"No one, not even the most radical of Sony fanboys, have ever said that they wanted the media to do the same for Sony as they do now for Microsoft."
That's where this rant starts going overboard, I'm afraid.
Imo, Motion+ wins by a long shot since it's the one being incorporated the most and the likes of Zelda could show some great new gameplay ideas. As promising as Kinect can be for innovation and what not, it's still going to take a long time to see the promised innovation we saw in the previews 1+ year ago.
I always enjoy a controversial subject like this. Guy trying to get his PhD makes a really good case for defending Gears story (you read that right). I guess a case could be made for it since it does have a trilogy of books now.
That's what all 3 companies do.
If only we could post gifs on here. I think a Joker: "And here...we...go" gif would be perfect for this situation :P.
Edit: Just for the record, the man was basically their PR guy for quite some time. The man wants his product to sell (shocker!). I'm pretty sure everyone's been caught in their own hype before.
Good thing you edited what I initially saw.
7/10 makes the game overall decent? A "just decent" is around a low a 5-ish (maybe a low 6) in most of my review cases :P.
Have sites given info regarding how much MS COULD be making off each piece of hardware? It just seems tough to believe the production cost is around $99.99, unless you know something about what each component costs.
You're basically at the level of 'delusional' if you think you're allowed to discount 1 extra year of 360 sales. Who's to say if 360 started the same year as Wii/PS3 if it still kept a killer app like Gears of War?
I don't want to make this come out as an incrimination, but do you own a 360? If you check out your memory, you'll see updates of any sort don't take that much space.
Note: Nothing wrong with you don't since it seems fair to assume updates can take up a bunch of space.