Hope everyone enjoyed the review. Please feel free to leave any comments and/or questions below. :)
Running behind on trying to get these out so I can catch up but it's pretty tough for me to do so atm. Anyways, would like to see your thoughts on it. If you haven't tried first episode yet, I think steam sales still have it at a nice discounted price of $2.49, but don't take my word on that since many are subject to change daily.
But that's similar to just about every other MM after the first one too. Look at the disparity of focus between the 1 and the rest.
2 centers its location around a settlement; Thunderdome centers around Bartertown/the power gamble and the kids later on; Fury Road centers around Furiosa and getting the wives out.
It's not accurate to really consider his role in FR "small" either. He's instrumental in specific parts of the film. I can s...
That's bound to happen when the only modern Mad Max is Fury Road though, and it does have stuff like the war boys and Gas Town in it.
"Fury Road is a little over rated, it's like a spin off they've shoe horned Max into. Probably would have been better if they called it Furious Furiosa and have Max cameo at the end"
I'm confused by this, considering that the Mad Max name has gravitated more towards it being the universe after the firs...
Ball in a cup also has that distinction..
"I love the game very much."
I'll say. That's a crazy amount of time and effort poured into it. Nice work.
While I do my best in avoiding anything that isn't at least considered the 1.0.0 version of a game (save for a few examples), I can see this being a great thing for Xbox One for those who like the model.
They still need to enact a thought-out refund system to complement the free demo part and you pretty much have your bases covered. Only the earnest developers would be willing to bring their game preview to Xbox One with that enabled. A great thing for Xbox One along ...
You sure you tried that with social matches? I saw the 'Invite Friend' option on there just yesterday when you're in pre-game lobby area.
"I don't think anyone's blasting anyone for thinking one or the other like it usually is."
I would like to think that...but then I remember some recent reported/- bubble voted comments bringing that up, unfortunately.
Haha, thought it was him. He actually just posted a E3 rant recently too. He has blinders on with the interesting new IP's brought up at E3, but I can understand his position on the glut of sequels from so many AAA devs. ...
While I worry about going over the moon for a set of conferences that was packed with sequel upon sequel, I've gotta say I did enjoy a lot of what I saw. For a glorified Powerpoint presentation filled with suits trying to push product, there was a lot of enthusiasm to just present fun stuff and excite the crowd. Even Nintendo's lacking direct feed still felt like a fun diversion. Wooly World + Star Fox Zero look like a ton of fun.
I know last year, people seemed mo...
Even for the Ultimate Edition now? Why can't even the Definitive/Ultimate re-releases come with 100% of the in-game content? It may be a irrelevant skin but it's still dumb. Rare Replay's the only 2015 MS title to avoid these sorts of bonuses, it seems.
Thanks LaMode. Glad you enjoyed it.
Get back here, you!
*Starts chasing*
Edit: Admittedly, I have some pretty big nostalgia glasses for Goldeneye. Props to the insane amount of content in PD though. Absolutely ambitious.
@showtimefolks
"How long was the halo 4 story? Reviewers said it was very good story but sort really short is that true? "
The runtime was shorter than the other main Halo games, maybe by about an hour or so. Those reviewers are right about that. The "very good story" part? You're talking about mainstream critics so they tend to oversell the quality of your typical game narrative. Had some commendable parts but overall wasn't a...
I understand that those can be frustrating but I don't really see banning them as being the most beneficial; yes, even if they're the milking 1 game or point per page type.
As Dark_king suggested, implementing some kind of specific sub-category like "opinion piece/list" and then having "1/3/5/etc. entries per page," like a review score on here, can inform users about what they're getting into. Information would be the best route.
This is just as pathetic as the baiting Ubisoft has done with Beyond Good and Evil 2.
"Well...maybe if Rayman performs well enough [while releasing in November between COD and AC]"
"Well...maybe if Beyond Good and Evil HD performs well enough."
Just a way to grab as many first week sales from the big DMC fans as possible.
That and some dumb gameplay design bothered me. Same, I still came away really enjoying the whole experience. It had a lot of heart put into it.
I'm curious to document my experience between this and SWTOR's launch. Say what you will about Bio's MMO, but they did a heck of a job trying to keep that experience as stable as possible.
And aside from some quest bugs, I poured in tens of hours early on that weren't interrupted by big issues.
I haven't even gotten around to finishing Hardline's campaign, and I almost have to push myself to do so. Which is a bit of shame to say since the 60FPS gameplay can certainly FEEL tight and responsive, but it's tied in with stupid game systems like arrests that make less and less sense over time. How is he even able to search police archives for guys with warrants or have the ability to arrest anyone after what happens in during the half-way point in the story?
...
Very interesting. Surprised to see this piece didn't get off the ground here.
Really? The overblown Return of Kings blog on that is still making a fuss? I know some people try to downplay that instance but that's still seriously a complaint?