naa.. i went pc gaming after snes, never turned to consoles after that.
though i am sure there must be some good games on them, though many dont interest me.
but its got the waggle.
mario says "its revolutionary"
:P
i bet we could get this game playing on the snes :P
i want an snes release, since that is the last console i ever bought.
block of text crit me for 9000hp.
we need WII HD iwata.
give us something based on a 4000series based ati gpu or a gt200 based nvidia gpu.
then we'd truely have a hd console.
that could trigger another graphics leap, with PC and WII HD being able to handle those games.
dam i am eager to see how fermi performs.
with no signs of 5870x2 yet.. i might be looking at fermi as an option. A single chip always performs. while sli or crossfire fails at times due to lack of optimisations.
dam look at all the ignorant ps3 fanboys trying to defend the cell lol.
there about 300 titles out on the ps3 now.. only 20 of them do 1080p (that too with low AA or none at all).
if the almighty cell was so powerful why arent rest of the games running at 1080p... lol even most first party games arent 1080, including the latest tombraider 1.5 *cough* uncharted2 runs at 720... why wasnt it made 1080? could it be there just isnt enough juice int he ps3? lol
...
any multiplat on the pc will look better then the ps3 exclusives.
farcry2
asssins creed
fall out 3
not going to even mention crysis lol.
also lets not forget pc gaming is cheaper then consoles..
so while ps3, 360 users pay a high price they get inferior quality for multiplats thats for sure.
hell if ps3 is so darn powerful, why arent most of its exclusives in 1080p? ps3 has like over 300 titles out now.....
cant compare the versions just by looking at the screenshorts.
in game at full screen its a whole different story.
also the pc version just has superior controls and fps also at a lower price.
which is why it just is much better then the console versions.
not to mention free potential dlcs, mods, faster load times.
pc >>>>>>>&g t;>>ps3=360
higher fps, mods, free dlcs, better graphics, mouse keyboard support.
all at a cheapr price ;-)
lol i get disagreed at for asking prices of the xbox hard drives:P
as usual pc wins :P while being cheaper lol
i cant imagine playing this game on thumbsticks.
lol i could almost get a 80gb SSD on the pc for that price.
microsoft really knows how to rip their customers.
for the unaware, SSD is the newest tech probably 15-20 times faster then the HD's microsoft provides.
equip a pc with an SSD and say bye bye to any load times.
how much does microsoft charge for a 120gb hd?
they are very simular..
some multiplats ps3 out does the 360 some its the other way about.
however lately its been neck and neck. anyone comparing the 2 and thinking one FAR better then the other is just being biased.
like i said.. if you want to see a real difference then PC is where its at.
i almost feel bad for the ppl who bought tf2 or l4d on the consoles.
oh well they did it to themselves.
ps3 or xbox.. both will be simular, saying otherwise would be ignorant. Just hope the console versions have a stead framerate and 720p atleast.
now if you really are concerened about a difference then the HD (PC) version is the only way to go.
@gamingsucksnow
read again "primarily due to its inability to play those games."
we arent seeing any graphics intensive game on the wii.. which is why the hardcore crowd just isnt present on it.
just afew games wii has missed out on:
Assissins creed
border lands
dragon age
batman arkum
a proper version of COD
grid
left 4 dead
mirrors edge
operation flashpoint d...
@gamingsucksnow
if you are gonna quote me atleast learn to copy and paste properly.
I never said "win back all 3rd party games"
i said "win back all the third party support"
its a fact nintendo has lost support from all third parties ever since wii was released primarily due to its inability to play those games.
hopefully if a wii hd does come out third party titles will see a return to it.
your Quadcore @3.2ghz will be great for this game.
though here is one game the I7 really shines at.
remember few months ago most of us thought I7 isnt much better then the quad cores.
If crossfire is well optimised i could be looking at running this game close to 100fps @1920*1200
though one thing to take note of, even a core to duo 8400 (which is about 2yrs old now) still manages to do 37 avg fps while the lowest fps is still above 24 ...