You defend the game pretty well, especially since you haven't played it...
I feel like people are getting overly defensive and worked up about this.
"Enhancing the online experience" for PSN+ members would mean that they are excluding regular PSN members from online features.
Are you suggesting they give better servers to PSN+ people only (btw what game needs better servers)? Then you're basically paying for xbox live.
Actually, I would get them just for the trophies anyway, but I'm a trophy whore so...
Level 14!
How the hell could you have only purchased 3 PSN games ever?
A statement like that makes me wonder why you even have a PS3. Do you use it only as a bluray player just based on principal or something? I think its pretty rare to have people on this site that don't actually play games.
I need an explanation! IT BOGGLES MY MIND!
Kojima: Open the pod bay doors, Metal Gear.
Metal Gear: I'm sorry, Kojima. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Kojima: What's the problem?
Metal Gear: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.
Kojima: What are you talking about, Metal Gear?
Metal Gear: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
Kojima: I don't know what you're talking about, Metal Gear.
Metal Gear: I know that you...
Who would make xbox portable games though? They don't have enough first party devs.
If they made a portable that played most XBL games (linking directly to XBL, etc), I could see that taking off. I don't see MS surviving in the traditional portable market though. Nintendo has that by the balls.
You need someone to explain to you why you pay less for almost the same thing 7 years later?
....
I really don't understand this "I love paying $3.33 a month" perspective. When MS finally drops the subscription fee is everyone going to be saying "Oh, that's too bad! I just fudging loved paying money for XBL...maybe I'll just burn that money now, or use it to buy toilet paper and contemplate the symbolism."
No, you'l...
I was able to kill them by calling my friend and a random guy in. Then I watched them die slow and horrible deaths...
Luckily they were able to help me kill one and lower the 2nd's health enough so I was able to survive. That one is a b!tch by yourself though. I had been trying offline and it is impossible (except for that glitch which I had never heard of, I guess).
I'm not saying what Sony did was right. They totally insulted an MS product, but they used a "representative" who they branded as a joker. All of his commercials are funny, so it is perceived as lighthearted by most people that watch it.
Also, people can call Kevin Butler an a**hole for saying that stuff, and it's okay because he's not even a real person. I can understand console maker vs. console maker duking it out, but when a developer gets into it I ...
But none of Sony's first party devs have said anything (as far as I know) about Kinect. If MS had said it themselves I don't think it would have been that big an issue, just more rivalry. Being a dev and saying a competitive consoles tech is 'shit' seems very underhanded.
It's like MS has their hands up his ass and he's just their puppet. If they had ever said anything positive about another console, I'd believe they actually were allowed to have ...
Actually I thought Kevin Butler was a real person too. Not that he actually acted like he does or works for Sony as anything other than an actor, but I didn't think they used an alternate name. I guess that prevents people from sending the real actor hate mail though, lol.
And "Seaman" had Leonard Nimoy. I don't see Leonard Nimoy in "Milo".
No Spock, NO BUY!
/jk
But seriously, I still don't see how you can move around a 3D world with Natal. Implementations like the fight game, and Sorcery make Move a better motion controller, imo. I can at least see some core applications with the demos and games shown so far.
The books were written AFTER the game was made, and they are written by multiple people. I don't think any of them have anything to do with the games initial vision.
I haven't read any of them, but I doubt MC's back story is anything like what the initial creator's conceived (which, admittedly, was probably just "bad-ass in armor").
Anyway, my point is that an after-the-fact history doesn't really mean much. I'm fairly certai...
Except the part where they actually make games.
Having first party studios helps bring in real exclusives, which is apparently something that MS has yet to learn.
I don't understand the willingness to pay for something that should be free. Sony will eventually catch up to Live even if it isn't until the PS4. Why would you voluntarily pay for something that is eventually going to be available for nothing. You are basically begging these companies to standardize subscriptions for online gaming, which is idiotic.
You should be hoping that Sony improves the service so much that MS finally drops the pay-to-play model.
Rockstar did not make this game and it is coming for PC as well. "THE Agency" is a Sony Online Entertainment game, while "Agent" is a Rockstar developed PS3 exclusive.
This is an MMO, and I haven't seen many MMO's with blow your socks off graphics.
-SPOILERS FOR ICO-
ICO does not need a sequel and the post credits ending is actually left up to interpretation. For example, you could interpret it as real, a dream, or they are both actually dead. SotC was a prequel and TLG will probably share a connection as well. In my opinion a sequel for ICO will just ruin it. The open ending is part of the charm and spelling everything out is just going to make it suck.
I think part of his point was that if you really care that much about graphics you'd buy all multiplatform games on the PC.
Are you saying you don't buy these games on that platform? Why not? If there is an actual reason then you just proved that graphics are not your primary concern.
Graphic comparisons are flamebait for 99% of people. Get the PC version if you care that much. Unless there are REAL issues like noticeable frame rate drops, these are ...
How is Just Cause 2 not an open world game?
It seemed pretty open to me.