They already did. The E3 conference was nearly all about games. They just need to coninue promoting the games for the gaming crowd.
Ah yes, I mixed up the release of this game with the PC version. :(. Ha, well in that case, it was my most anticipated game but it isn't available at launch. not sure why you got disagrees.
My most anticipated game for the PS4 launch.
Cool. I'll have to give this a look.
To those that disagree:
It is possible that neither of my scenarios happen. But, with both consoles possibly releasing in November, and more than likely before November 28th, there is a strong possibility that the two consoles could overlap. Unless one releases in the first full week of the month, that only leaves two weeks left to work with.
I wouldn't be surprised if both consoles were to release on the same day, or at least in back to back weeks.
I wish!
Not defending Microsoft, but I'm getting one day 1 because I'm interested in the games it has coming around launch. Looking forward to Dead Rising 3, Killer Instinct, maybe Crimson Dragon if that is a release game, Forza 5, and Spark. I'm not focusing on what Microsoft almost did with the DRM stuff. That's out now, and I can play my console offline if I want.
I'm also getting the PS4 Day 1 because of Outlast, the numerous free to play games, and Killzo...
Right there with you. Getting both on day 1. Exciting times!
Can't fault them for that. Ball is in Microsoft's court.
Would be fine for me. Already have the ps4 paid off as it was the cheapest. Gives me more time to save money for the Xbox
I love cross buy. In some cases, it has pushed me to purchase games that I may not have otherwise. I like the value that it offers. Vita will still have its own quality, original games, as we've seen with titles like Soul Sacrifice for instance, and many upcoming games still on the horizon.
I thought Live wasn't included in the day one package. If so, that is great.
I like having all options. I'm really excited about what each company has lined up through the rest of the year, including Nintendo.
Whelp, guess i'll be buying both PS3 and Vita versions :)
I don't know why Kinect is still an issue. Is it because of the thought of it driving up the price? If Microsoft kept Kinect int he box and sold the whole thing for 399, would you still consider it an issue?
Is it because people still think the Kinect is "watching" you? I don't even see how that could be a problem if the console is offline.
Both of these companies will do whatever it takes to get consumer money. Neither cares about the gamer community other than how much we pay for their product.
They really want to make sure that Kinect is in every box, and that developers know that every XBO user has one. It makes the product a bit more relevant this time around. While keeping Kinect as part of the package, I think a lot of people would be okay with that if they priced the box more competitively and made the use of the camera optional and not required to make the system run.
Me too. It is my most anticipated release game right now.
I didn't find Judgement bad at all. I didn't touch the multiplayer though, so I can't comment on that portion. The single player on the other hand was pretty much standard Gears besides a few changes here and there.